+- Kodi Community Forum (https://forum.kodi.tv)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=222)
+--- Forum: Hardware (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=112)
+--- Thread: Win Intel HTPCs/NUCs & Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback (/showthread.php?tid=266316)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - 3DBuff - 2017-03-16
I think we have a lot of tests, opinions and some speculations
At the end it helps with hardware decisions.
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - Korrigan - 2017-03-16
(2017-03-16, 13:54)3DBuff Wrote:So it didnt actually detect 3D on its own. That means it probably was just 540 lines per eye. Which is technically a big difference that he didn't see. My point: it's all very subjective (although I agree that MVC to 4k interlaced does sound great)(2017-03-16, 13:22)Korrigan Wrote:(2017-03-16, 03:23)p750mmx Wrote: TV displays [3D][1080p@24Hz]But isn't that half the resolution of "Hardware Based"? So there is a "big" (?) difference and you just can't see it?
Picture looks good, the same as with hardware option, not different that I can see.
No stutters, smooth image.
The display shows [3D]. It has to detect something. It's not just 540 lines per eye. Maybe it is some hardware handshaking and 1080 lines per eye interlaced or frame packing.
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - 3DBuff - 2017-03-17
It's true looking at the screen and trying to decide if the previous set up was better specially after it takes a while to change the setup could be very subjective. You tend to like brand new shiny toy better then the old dusty one, no matter what
Unless you see something really striking wrong with the image it's hard to tell if image from 20 min. before was better. True test would be 2 identical screens side by side playing the same content but we don't have this luxury. However if people in this forum agree that 4K interlaced over HDMI 2.0 is better compared to 1.4 port with hardware 3D then most likely it is. This may even be the fact that new video card and HDMI 2.0 has faster electronics that can produce better sharper image. When the image is full size 3D 4k on the TV screen then scaling and interlacing had to be done one way or another by computer or TV. We are trying to decide if sending unprocessed Frame Packing (2 x 1080p frames) at 24 fps and let TV make it into interlaced 3D 4K display is better then processing it into interlaced ready frame 3840x2160 at the source and send to TV as is at 24 fps is better.
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - 3DBuff - 2017-03-19
(2017-03-16, 18:30)p750mmx Wrote: So just test setting 3840x2160@30Hz on Kaby Lake 1.4 port and watch CPU load when playing? I do that later today when the wife is out of the picture
I'm really curious about this. Did you get a chance to test it? From your previous post: HDMI 2.0 3D interlaced really good picture but the same on 1.4 port stuttered frame and heavy CPU load. Can you just double check on second system.
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - NicCo - 2017-03-21
New build available :
http://mirrors.kodi.tv/test-builds/win32/KodiSetup-20170321-85da1e3c99-msdk_mvc_wip.exe
http://mirrors.kodi.tv/test-builds/win32/KodiSetup-20170321-85da1e3c99-msdk_mvc_wip.pdb
Thank you very much afedchin
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - Skank - 2017-03-21
Cool , thank you!
Very much appreciated !
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - hdmkv - 2017-03-21
Ditto... thanks @afedchin.
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - Skank - 2017-03-21
Anyone know what the fixes are? Or just based on 17.1 rc?
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - movie78 - 2017-03-21
(2017-03-21, 15:04)Skank Wrote: Anyone know what the fixes are? Or just based on 17.1 rc?
17.1
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - p750mmx - 2017-03-21
(2017-03-19, 16:19)3DBuff Wrote:Excuse for the interrupt, but nothing has changed sins my previous respond, will pick it up when time is available for this.(2017-03-16, 18:30)p750mmx Wrote: So just test setting 3840x2160@30Hz on Kaby Lake 1.4 port and watch CPU load when playing? I do that later today when the wife is out of the picture
I'm really curious about this. Did you get a chance to test it? From your previous post: HDMI 2.0 3D interlaced really good picture but the same on 1.4 port stuttered frame and heavy CPU load. Can you just double check on second system.
http://forum.kodi.tv/showthread.php?tid=266316&pid=2549720#pid2549720
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - dexter98 - 2017-03-21
Thanks afedchin for the update! Really appreciate your efforts!!!
Sent from my HTC One_M8
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - Statikk - 2017-03-21
Thanks afedchin!!
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - filmgeek47 - 2017-03-22
Thanks afedchin!
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - Timothee - 2017-03-22
Thanks @afedchin!
RE: Intel HTPC/NUC's w/reliable Kodi-native 3D MVC Playback - movie78 - 2017-03-22
I see a lot of new users using the 3D MVC build, I am wondering how many users are still in this 3D adventure?