v18 LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - Printable Version +- Kodi Community Forum (https://forum.kodi.tv) +-- Forum: Support (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=33) +--- Forum: General Support (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=111) +---- Forum: Linux (https://forum.kodi.tv/forumdisplay.php?fid=52) +---- Thread: v18 LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) (/showthread.php?tid=298462) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
|
RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - debutanker - 2018-04-18 (2018-04-18, 11:54)HiassofT Wrote:(2018-04-18, 10:07)debutanker Wrote: Fixed my problem with MCE RC6 IR-Receiver - many thanks.@debutanker thanks a lot for your feedback! As you guys always have more than only a few minutes for us, i will find of course some minutes for you! Tested with several values and first value which works for me is "64000". Edit: would be nice, if my mce receiver shows the same "snappy" behavior as my NUC receiver now does. RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - HiassofT - 2018-04-18 (2018-04-18, 12:27)debutanker Wrote: As you guys always have more than only a few minutes for us, i will find of course some minutes for you!Awesome, thanks a lot for the tests! So, if I understand you correctly, 64000 and higher values work, but values below 64000 break the remote? It would be great if you could do two (hopefully last for now) tests on #0416: post the "ir-ctl -r" outputs of a buttonpress, once when using the working (64000) ir-ctl -t value, and once when using a non-working value (63000, 60000, whatever you noticed didn't work). Quote:Edit: would be nice, if my mce receiver shows the same "snappy" behavior as my NUC receiver now does.Interesting. Which receiver are you using on the NUC (post the ir-keytable output)? The typically used ite-cir should give about the same performance as mceusb receivers - at least they both default to a 100ms timeout which is one of the factors regarding "snappiness". Are you also using the Harmony / RC6 remote there? so long, Hias RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - atoulmin - 2018-04-18 (2018-04-18, 12:11)Milhouse Wrote:(2018-04-17, 10:10)atoulmin Wrote: I’ve been running these builds for a while and they’ve been great. Thanks I’ll give it a go RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - HiassofT - 2018-04-18 @debutanker no need to run more tests, just got an email from Sean (the Linux kernel IR maintainer), he could reproduce the issue and posted a fix. I'll have a look at it and check if we can include the fix in the next build. so long, Hias RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - Milhouse - 2018-04-18 (2018-04-18, 13:06)HiassofT Wrote:Quote:Edit: would be nice, if my mce receiver shows the same "snappy" behavior as my NUC receiver now does.Interesting. Which receiver are you using on the NUC (post the ir-keytable output)? The typically used ite-cir should give about the same performance as mceusb receivers - at least they both default to a 100ms timeout which is one of the factors regarding "snappiness". Are you also using the Harmony / RC6 remote there? I created the following as /storage/.config/udev.rules.d/70-input-repeat.rules which reduces the repeat period to 50ms and makes my RC6/Harmony One with Skylake NUC much snappier, now almost as snappy as the very snappy Ortek VRC-1100 USB IR that I use on other devices:
You can tune the settings interactively with ir-keytable --delay=500 --period=50 until you find the values you like, then set them in the udev.rule so that they are applied when the system starts.
RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - debutanker - 2018-04-18 Here we go: https://pastebin.com/ymiEskzy Regarding my NUC, its only the integrated receiver controlled also by Harmony Hub. Compared to my external MCE receiver, controlling is much more faster. edit: (2018-04-18, 13:38)HiassofT Wrote: @debutanker no need to run more tests, just got an email from Sean (the Linux kernel IR maintainer), he could reproduce the issue and posted a fix. I'll have a look at it and check if we can include the fix in the next build. Too late... RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - atoulmin - 2018-04-18 (2018-04-18, 12:11)Milhouse Wrote:(2018-04-17, 10:10)atoulmin Wrote: I’ve been running these builds for a while and they’ve been great. Didn’t work. I will try a fresh install of libreelec. RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - jeinnor - 2018-04-18 Hi I find when using profiles it is slow to log into one of the profiles, once the profile has loaded things run okay! Logging out of one profile and signing into another is quicker. Is there a reason for this? RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - HiassofT - 2018-04-18 (2018-04-18, 13:41)debutanker Wrote: Here we go: What do you mean with "faster"? Quicker response to button presses, quicker button repeat? The goal of the IR latency patches we are currently testing is to reduce the time until the system "sees" that a button has been pressed or released. The effect of that is most visible if you disable command repeat on your Harmony remote (so it sends out only a single IR message on a short press). It takes about 50ms to transmit a rc-6 message plus the configured timeout from the IR receiver - about 25ms if the mceusb optimization works, about 100ms with the ite-cir receiver on the NUC (that's the minimum timeout this receiver supports) until the button press is recognized. So, roughly 75ms on receivers that support the optimization and about 150ms on the NUC. If you configure the Harmony to use command repeats the system will "see" the button press after either the timeout or when the second IR message is received - whichever comes earlier. rc-6 sends repeats every ~110ms, so on optimized receivers nothing changes (button will be recognized after ~75ms), but on the NUC the button will now be seen about 110ms after the button press. Without the optimization ite-cir used a default timeout of 200ms, meaning without command repeat it took about 250ms until the system "saw" the button, but with command repeat it was less than half the time. So changing the command repeat feature of the harmony or pressing a button very quickly vs a tad longer of a normal "dumb" remote can have a rather large impact. The ir-keytable settings milhouse mentioned take effect after the system detected a button press. They influence how long you have hold a button before repeat kicks in and once repeat started how fast the repeated button presses are sent out. The overall speed of the system (CPU, storage) also is an important factor. A NUC with a Core i CPU and a SSD should have no problems reacting quickly to input (and keeping up with fast button repeats), but a low-end Atom or an RPi will quite certainly struggle as loading backdrops from disk (or a slow SD card) and getting them on screen etc are quite complex operations. BTW: tonight's build will contain the mceusb fix, it would be great if you could test the build and report back if it works. so long, Hias RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - kszabo - 2018-04-18 My unprofessional bug report (generic x64, Intel KabyLake i3-7100): - automatic adjust refresh rate does not work on v0407 I went back to a version from 03/2018 (0301) and it works again at once RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - busta.rhymes - 2018-04-18 I need help bad Hi guys, im trying to install libreelec on my new gemini lake NUC all day. It just doesnt work. The installer wont Load and it always gets stuck at Waiting for Installer to Load. The New Gemini Lake NUC does not support Legacy Boot and only supports UEFI Boot. It only has the UEFI Boot option default checked and it is greyd out and intel say no legacy is supported. I hope that this is not causing the problem. I asumed that the error might be the install stick but my other pc installs it just fine with it. And i also tried the standard libreelec version 8,25 and it also gets stuck in the Waiting for Intstaller to Load. Any idea what it could be? I just cant get into the installer with the gemini lake nuc. I just removed the ssd with no luck. Built it back in. I have no idea why i cant get further then the black screen. Here is someone with the same problem with this nuc on the libre elec forum: https://forum.libreelec.tv/thread/12018-nuc7cjyh-cannot-boot-libreelec-from-usb-or-sd/ RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - gromgsxr - 2018-04-19 Are the intel hd audio patches still included? i just tried the 0417 version on my nuc6cayh and it only passes DD and DTS, even DD+ Eac3 was sketchy and only worked sporadically. and anything like TrueHD all i got was silence, and after trying to play those it killed the 2 channel pcm from the menu and i had no sound until i rebooted. RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - Milhouse - 2018-04-19 (2018-04-19, 00:10)gromgsxr Wrote: Are the intel hd audio patches still included? i just tried the 0417 version on my nuc6cayh and it only passes DD and DTS, even DD+ Eac3 was sketchy and only worked sporadically. and anything like TrueHD all i got was silence, and after trying to play those it killed the 2 channel pcm from the menu and i had no sound until i rebooted. Yep RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - Milhouse - 2018-04-19 (2018-04-18, 21:53)kszabo Wrote: My unprofessional bug report (generic x64, Intel KabyLake i3-7100): Did you read this post? RE: LibreELEC Testbuilds for x86_64 (Kodi 18.0) - Milhouse - 2018-04-19 (2018-04-18, 19:59)jeinnor Wrote: Hi Maybe an add-on is causing the delay. Try uploading a debug log (wiki) after you have reproduced the issue (enable debug logging, reboot, reproduce problem, upload log). Maybe someone will have some ideas after seeing your log. |