Posts: 1,104
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
2
theuni
Team-XBMC Communication Manager
Posts: 1,104
Why bother with all that? mount server:/share /media/mountpoint
or stick it in your fstab and be done with it. Mine's worked just fine like that for years.
TheUni
Posts: 212
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
1
Just to add, I actually had problems with NFS performance with a multi-media system and find that SMB works much better.
Posts: 26
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
0
Manub
Junior Member
Posts: 26
Hi,
Would it be possible to add NFS as a network protocol to add sources?
Now I have to fiddle around through SSH with scripts in order to get the mapped drives of my Synology NAS mapped.
Ideally the choice between NFS-TCP and NFS-UDP would be great, this to improve on some Gigabit problems, like it is know on boxes like Popcorn C-200 and Dune 3.0.
Thanks,
M.
Posts: 437
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation:
0
Not to mention that the NFS overhead is significantly less than that of an SMB share.
Posts: 26
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
0
Manub
Junior Member
Posts: 26
I fully agree that there is such difference between an Appliance and an Application, but what would you call XBMC Live then, the OS layer is not even easily accessible or thourgh SSH.
If you install, like me, XBMC Live on an ION, then this box becomes an Appliance.
Of course, if you run it as an application on Windows or Linux then you should do you mappings from the desktop or file manager.