Which model Mac Mini should I get?

  Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post Reply
Dumb ? Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 40
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 0
Post: #1
I'm looking to purchase a Mac Mini to use as a XBMC box and audiophile server. Would it be smarter to purchase the older unibody style (2010 I believe) since it has the Nvidia video card and DVD drive? Or would it make more sense to get the 2011 model? Let me know your thoughts as well as experiences with either model. Thank in advance.
find quote
ftballrunner Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 6
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 0
Post: #2
I was wondering this as well...
find quote
Ned Scott Offline
Team-Kodi Wiki Guy
Posts: 22,443
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 296
Location: Arizona, USA
Post: #3
I'd go with 2010 for an HTPC.

Search the forums (best to do it via google by using "site:forum.xbmc.org" since the native forum search kinda sucks) about mac minis. We've had a bunch of these threads, including ones about the recent mac minis.

You can make easy links to the XBMC wiki using double brackets around common XBMC words: [[debug log]] = debug log, [[Video library]] = Video library, [[SMB]] = SMB , [[userdata]] = userdata, etc
find quote
Dori Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 0
Post: #4
Any of them will do fine. 2010 ones had 320M nVidia chip so they work fine with 1080p. 2011 has either HD3000 or ATI graphics. Both work fine for 1080p. So it's a matter of choice. I went for 2011 basic model, upped RAM to 4GB and we live happily ever after Smile DVD I just don't need. And like the looks of a new one better since it ain't got an optical slot on the front which looked pretty damn ugly, IMO.

TV: LG 42PW450 3D
Soundbar: LG NB352OA
HTPC: Apple Mac mini MC815LL/A 2.3GHz i5
Remote: Logitech Harmony 600
Remote: XBMC Constellation
(This post was last modified: 2012-05-05 13:32 by Dori.)
find quote
Torroa Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 123
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 1
Post: #5
The new Ivy Bridge Mini, with possible HD4000, should be awailable this summer. I would probably wait for one of those...
find quote
Chris! Offline
Donor
Posts: 1,012
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 16
Location: England
Post: #6
Do you really need the Ivy Bridge performance gains for XBMC?


Flirc now has a forum: forum.flirc.tv
find quote
Torroa Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 123
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 1
Post: #7
Probably not for video decoding alone, but it runs much cooler as the TDP is around 40% lower than the current setup. And the Intel Quick Sync transcoding, if it will be supported by osX, is a big improvement over Sandy Bridge "Using Cyberlink Media Espresso the new chip turned a DRM-stripped Blu-ray of Harry Potter (130 minutes of 1080p video) into an iPad friendly format in just seven minutes without taxing the CPU.".

Also, in the the review at Hot Hardware, where playback of a 1080p YouTube video utilize 0% CPU usage is "kind of" impressive. Might be an overkill, but I would still wait and see. Even the buyers guide at MacRumors tells: Don't Buy - Updates soon
(This post was last modified: 2012-05-06 01:53 by Torroa.)
find quote
Ned Scott Offline
Team-Kodi Wiki Guy
Posts: 22,443
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 296
Location: Arizona, USA
Post: #8
It might even be worth waiting for a new Mac Mini simply because that will make older models become cheaper, then get an older model :D

You can make easy links to the XBMC wiki using double brackets around common XBMC words: [[debug log]] = debug log, [[Video library]] = Video library, [[SMB]] = SMB , [[userdata]] = userdata, etc
find quote
Chris! Offline
Donor
Posts: 1,012
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation: 16
Location: England
Post: #9
I suppose, thanks for enlightening me


Flirc now has a forum: forum.flirc.tv
find quote