Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
That sounds fantastic, see
https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc and particular the readme below around quick links for how to contribute and coding guidelines etc, submitting prs and whatnot.
FYI adding the skin library list view is set flag already started with
https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/6896 only needs skinning portions which Im trying to figure out. not being a skinner or naturally inclined to any coding, will take me some time to figure but if possible Ill submit those changes.
(helpful when group movies in sets is enabled in skin settings
Movie_sets (wiki)).
Some progress is better than no progress at all. Looking forward for your work. if you need any help with git I can help you there.
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
2015-04-07, 23:50
(This post was last modified: 2015-04-07, 23:52 by un1versal.)
Yes, I understand perfectly the issue, and I agree with what you saying.
However you cannot do what you propose now and no matter how much you want to, fact is you cant...
My suggestion is a workaround for now (sort of self deprecating description on suggestion), so in the future when you dont need the pain in the backside workaround (that solves the issue though you may hate it) you can just do what will be (your non existent solution abeit perfect) . Its always a pain when things are introduced but if more people contributed then things would be a lot better.
I can tell you this much, if I had the skills to implement it, it would be done, 1.5 years ago.
Posts: 828
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation:
19
Would it be so hard (codingwise) to add a Setting to "Options" -> Video -> Database -> Called "Hide Single Movies in Set Node"
isnt it also easy codingwise? (C++?)
Skinningcodewise it would be something like this:
<visible>Integer.Greatherthan(Container.NumItems,1) + Skin.HasSetting(HideSingleMovieSets)</visible>
is it realy so much harder in C++? No Idea!
I could live with how it is today, but would be cool to see someone do it, specialy if it would be a task as easy it looks in Skincode.
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
2015-04-09, 10:19
(This post was last modified: 2015-04-09, 10:20 by un1versal.)
(2015-04-08, 22:58)Rantanplan-1 Wrote: Would it be so hard (codingwise) to add a Setting to "Options" -> Video -> Database -> Called "Hide Single Movies in Set Node"
isnt it also easy codingwise? (C++?)
Skinningcodewise it would be something like this:
<visible>Integer.Greatherthan(Container.NumItems,1) + Skin.HasSetting(HideSingleMovieSets)</visible>
is it realy so much harder in C++? No Idea!
I could live with how it is today, but would be cool to see someone do it, specialy if it would be a task as easy it looks in Skincode.
If you recon its that easy in skinning why dont you submit a PR that adds a settings etc? Im sure this is preferred rather than hardcoding into core.
When jmorey is all spun up then I suppose then will have another take on it.
Posts: 73
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation:
0
+1 Before seeing this I thought this is a bug
Posts: 3,449
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
15
Skank
Posting Freak
Posts: 3,449
Euh so in short, can i hide sets containing only one movie? but that movie should be listed in normal list as one movie
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
You can, but need to remove movie from set using the kodi built in movie set manager, which solution displeases most people here apparently though it works.
Posts: 42
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
0
smpn
Junior Member
Posts: 42
+1 should be an option to hide sets with only one movie. IMHO should be the default.
Posts: 31,445
Joined: Jan 2011
2015-09-03, 04:12
(This post was last modified: 2015-09-03, 04:13 by Ned Scott.)
That is the default. They're simply not hidden from the sets node, which is really just for management rather than browsing.
Yes, this request is still valid, but I just don't understand why people are using the sets node for browsing. When I look for a movie to watch, it's usually by something that is about the movie, such as genre, year, directors, a rating of some kind, etc. I don't really care if the movie itself has sequels or not. Sets are nice to group up movies in the main browsing nodes. The sets node itself is... an odd place to start a movie from.
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
For us here its simple.
If we wish to start watching a movie set from its first through to last movie and dont wish to navigate through all the remainder of library entries the movie set node is the natural and only choice that makes sense.
This request has caused WW3 back when this thing was added and years later its still as it is, and the workaround exists. I suggest people use until a more ideal solution comes along, its not that hard.
IMO though there's way more movie set related support (by default) Ide like to see implemented rather than this which if I had a todo list this would be at the very bottom where sets are concerned.