2014-04-21, 15:19
Quote:If something goes wrong, I'll just require it from the same place I got it from.
lol, pretty much
But depending on how media you lose, that could take weeks to "get back"
Quote:If something goes wrong, I'll just require it from the same place I got it from.
(2014-04-21, 06:34)LazerBlue Wrote:That is what home insurance for. Since I bought it from stores, I have proof of it. In case of fire or disaster, I'll get new Blu-ray discs. If my house is on fire, gadget is the last thing I worry about. For me, it is the least important thing in the house....(2014-04-21, 04:43)bluray Wrote:(2014-04-21, 02:41)pr0xZen Wrote: Oh, but what about polycarbonate mites and termites?No termites here, because my house is very well treated and there is no natural disaster here either. I feel very confident that my Blu-ray movies are very safe by storing it at two locations (original disc and hard drive)....
Unless, god forbid I hope it never happens to anyone, a fire..
(2014-04-21, 06:34)LazerBlue Wrote: Even though I have the media, I do not want to spend that time reencoding my movies. It took 3 weeks when I was unemployed the first time around and that was over 3 years ago.You don't have to re-rip all of it at the same time. I don't ripped everything either. I ripped only our favorite movies. If we want to re-watch other movies, we can simply throw a Blu-ray disc in the optical drive. We don't re-watch Blu-ray disc very often either.....
(2014-04-21, 17:07)TugboatBill Wrote: I use an unraid array for my backup. Online content is kept in a Synology NAS. Oh, and I just added the f*** head to my ignore list. I try to be tolerant of the ignorant, but sometimes ...
(2014-04-21, 00:30)nickr Wrote: Having said that, it's only movies.
(2014-04-21, 22:54)Solidify Wrote: To get back on-topic, for those that backup their films and TV shows (not the ones you rip from tangible Blurays or DVD, I'm talking about the ones you get elsewhere *hint hint*), don't you find that the cost of having all of that media backup up far exceeds the advantages of having that backup.That is a very relevant point. TPB is your backup :-)
In other words, say you have 10TB of films and TV shows that you've acquired online *hint hint*. And you keep all of that content backup up (whether that's having each drive mirrored or simply working out a RAID array that gives you however much fault tolerance you'd like), don't you find that between the amount of money you spend to power, maintain and purchase those backup drives for your media, you don't really encounter a loss of data often enough to make the whole process worthy of your money and space (considering you can theoretically just re-download everything, no matter how long it would take, provided you have an unlimited data plan)?
I'm in that boat and that's the only motive keeping me from backing up any of this media. Plain and simple, because it can be re-downloaded. It would sure be a pain to have to re-acquire 10TB or more of data, but I'd much rather do that than spend 10TBs worth of drives to backup media IN CASE is goes bad, since it's located on the web anyways.
What are your thoughts on that? It's something that is on my mind more and more now that my media collection of films and TV shows is rapidly growing.
(2014-04-21, 22:54)Solidify Wrote: To get back on-topic, for those that backup their films and TV shows (not the ones you rip from tangible Blurays or DVD, I'm talking about the ones you get elsewhere *hint hint*), don't you find that the cost of having all of that media backup up far exceeds the advantages of having that backup.
In other words, say you have 10TB of films and TV shows that you've acquired online *hint hint*. And you keep all of that content backup up (whether that's having each drive mirrored or simply working out a RAID array that gives you however much fault tolerance you'd like), don't you find that between the amount of money you spend to power, maintain and purchase those backup drives for your media, you don't really encounter a loss of data often enough to make the whole process worthy of your money and space (considering you can theoretically just re-download everything, no matter how long it would take, provided you have an unlimited data plan)?
I'm in that boat and that's the only motive keeping me from backing up any of this media. Plain and simple, because it can be re-downloaded. It would sure be a pain to have to re-acquire 10TB or more of data, but I'd much rather do that than spend 10TBs worth of drives to backup media IN CASE is goes bad, since it's located on the web anyways.
What are your thoughts on that? It's something that is on my mind more and more now that my media collection of films and TV shows is rapidly growing.
(2014-04-21, 23:12)nickr Wrote: When it said it was "unavailable, do you want to remove" I wrote it down and made a note to re-rip it.
(2014-04-21, 23:19)Solidify Wrote:When I say "re-rip", I might have *hint hint* meant "reobtain"(2014-04-21, 23:12)nickr Wrote: When it said it was "unavailable, do you want to remove" I wrote it down and made a note to re-rip it.
Although you addressed my point, the above comment doesn't deal with online download. It's easy, but tiresome, to re-rip from hard copies.
Don't you have films and TV shows that you don't have on hard copies? Media that you've downloaded online? If so, do you back that up? If so, how...
That's what I'm interested in seeing.
Edit: tboggie, I like you unRAId idea: one parity drive covers all the drives, as long as you keep replacing that failed drive if and when it fails. However, try to understand that I don't have any tangible copies. Every byte of media I have has been downloaded online and is digitally stored. That\s why I'm trying to see what the general consensus is for users that have that same downloading habit, before my media library gets too big and I lose a big chunk of it.
(2014-04-21, 22:54)Solidify Wrote: To get back on-topic, for those that backup their films and TV shows (not the ones you rip from tangible Blurays or DVD, I'm talking about the ones you get elsewhere *hint hint*), don't you find that the cost of having all of that media backup up far exceeds the advantages of having that backup.
In other words, say you have 10TB of films and TV shows that you've acquired online *hint hint*. And you keep all of that content backup up (whether that's having each drive mirrored or simply working out a RAID array that gives you however much fault tolerance you'd like), don't you find that between the amount of money you spend to power, maintain and purchase those backup drives for your media, you don't really encounter a loss of data often enough to make the whole process worthy of your money and space (considering you can theoretically just re-download everything, no matter how long it would take, provided you have an unlimited data plan)?
I'm in that boat and that's the only motive keeping me from backing up any of this media. Plain and simple, because it can be re-downloaded. It would sure be a pain to have to re-acquire 10TB or more of data, but I'd much rather do that than spend 10TBs worth of drives to backup media IN CASE is goes bad, since it's located on the web anyways.
What are your thoughts on that? It's something that is on my mind more and more now that my media collection of films and TV shows is rapidly growing.