2014-10-29, 21:16
I am using XBMC for years and I just created an account to suggest a feature improvement.
So, first of all, hello everyone !
Here is the issue :
I store my libraries on a Synology NAS and share it with my XBMC clients throught NFS.
However, sometimes I need to reboot my NAS (maintenance, update etc.), and the NFS mount points are indeed dead.
The problem is that NFS is not handling error recovery after a server reboot quiet well, and XBMC just fails to access files.
So, my suggestion is to implement the use of autofs instead of simple nfs.
This will allow to :
- reduce unnecessarily resource consumption when xbmc is unused
- mount NFS mount points only when needed (library scan, accessing files)
- and prevent XBMC from getting stucked after servers reboot as it will try to remount it upon request.
I installed myself autofs on raspmbc. I experienced it for more than a year and it is working perfectly, but I think it would be a good idea to integrate it in XBMC natively so that other users do not experience the same issue.
Thanks for reading
So, first of all, hello everyone !
Here is the issue :
I store my libraries on a Synology NAS and share it with my XBMC clients throught NFS.
However, sometimes I need to reboot my NAS (maintenance, update etc.), and the NFS mount points are indeed dead.
The problem is that NFS is not handling error recovery after a server reboot quiet well, and XBMC just fails to access files.
So, my suggestion is to implement the use of autofs instead of simple nfs.
This will allow to :
- reduce unnecessarily resource consumption when xbmc is unused
- mount NFS mount points only when needed (library scan, accessing files)
- and prevent XBMC from getting stucked after servers reboot as it will try to remount it upon request.
I installed myself autofs on raspmbc. I experienced it for more than a year and it is working perfectly, but I think it would be a good idea to integrate it in XBMC natively so that other users do not experience the same issue.
Thanks for reading