2014-12-16, 13:04
bkuhls have submitted a pull request to change the maximum amount of days displayed in the EPG to be changed to 30 here
https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/5946
But I am wondering if it should be changed then would it not be more logical to either change it to 28-days (for 4-weeks) or change it to 31-days (for amount of days in the longest months) instead make more sense than 30-days as the maximum?
All I'm saying is that when it comes to days, weeks, and months it probably does not make sense to use the number "30" as a maximum to allow.
Yes 30 days is a round number when divided by 10, however calender dates like days, weeks, and months i a year are not divided by 10.
So would it not be more not be more logical to divide an EPG into an amount of days that can be devised by 7 (days)?
If so then either have it 28-days (for 4-weeks), or 35-days (for 5-weeks), or a month which are usually 30 or 31 days, so maximum would then be 31 days to display, or?
https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/5946
But I am wondering if it should be changed then would it not be more logical to either change it to 28-days (for 4-weeks) or change it to 31-days (for amount of days in the longest months) instead make more sense than 30-days as the maximum?
All I'm saying is that when it comes to days, weeks, and months it probably does not make sense to use the number "30" as a maximum to allow.
Yes 30 days is a round number when divided by 10, however calender dates like days, weeks, and months i a year are not divided by 10.
So would it not be more not be more logical to divide an EPG into an amount of days that can be devised by 7 (days)?
If so then either have it 28-days (for 4-weeks), or 35-days (for 5-weeks), or a month which are usually 30 or 31 days, so maximum would then be 31 days to display, or?
I will have a look at 
