2015-02-02, 18:18
iPood
(2015-02-02, 14:58)Martijn Wrote:(2015-02-02, 14:53)Bridgwater Wrote: Ithink it is a waste of time, and literally. What really is the fascination of having two names 1) Kodi 2) Waste of time name. Why not just stick to Kodi 15.0 or Kodi 15.1 etc and then gee yet me guess when a more stable complete new build comes along it is simply called Kodi 16.0. I really do not know why the need to use two names.
guess you don't know that almost any software out there always uses development names beside the version number
(2015-02-03, 21:38)Bridgwater Wrote:(2015-02-02, 14:58)Martijn Wrote:(2015-02-02, 14:53)Bridgwater Wrote: Ithink it is a waste of time, and literally. What really is the fascination of having two names 1) Kodi 2) Waste of time name. Why not just stick to Kodi 15.0 or Kodi 15.1 etc and then gee yet me guess when a more stable complete new build comes along it is simply called Kodi 16.0. I really do not know why the need to use two names.
guess you don't know that almost any software out there always uses development names beside the version number
Yes I agree with you on that such as Windows but they are just code names for development such as Windows 7 Memphis, they do not actually release it as Windows 7 Memphis though, they leave out the code name and just call it Windows 7.
My point is why have the development name as well as Kodi 14.1 for example? Kodi 14.1 is all what is really needed in my view on the splash screen. Ok so the splash screen is not on there for long, so I might be OCD but I just do not see the need for two names upon release.
Still up too you guys, just my 5 cent's - Dallas worth.