Posts: 12,706
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation:
129
spiff
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 12,706
only thing i can suggest is a bit of patience, we are working on it
Posts: 12,706
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation:
129
spiff
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 12,706
you can now export your library. and no, it won't do it 'by default' nor will it ever. we use a database for very good reasons
Posts: 147
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation:
0
kemik
Senior Member
Posts: 147
Can you not use the MyMovies Collection Manager to do this?
Posts: 12,706
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation:
129
spiff
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 12,706
and until one of you guys who actually NEED such functionality stop talking about it, but steps up and does the work, that won't happen.
Posts: 49
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation:
0
mngrl1
Junior Member
Posts: 49
you are a grumpy bastard spiff
Posts: 47
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation:
0
Actually, another good reason is that scraping of media isn't yet perfect by any shape. If XBMC has detected wrong info for any reason, going in manually and selecting the correct movie manually often works. But, the next time you install XBMC fresh you have to do it all again. Not a problem if you only have 10 movies, but if you only had 10 movies you probably wouldn't need to run an XBMC library. Let's not forget the purpose of a media center here.
If there were a tick box that said 'also export nfo file' when you manually select a title it would prevent the need to continually manually set things that aren't right.
That said, the lastest binary XBMC itiration (not SVN as I have no idea how to compile that for live) has an incredibly improved library. After much reading it's fairly easy to enforce a specific page to be scraped by putting a url in an nfo file which IS picked up after a fresh install, however even this doesn't always work. (Perhaps there should be a comment noted in the manual scan option to look at a specific xbmc web page for help when having problems with the library?
Additionally, if XBMC WAS intelligent enough to export nfo files or export/import the library properly there would be no need to wait for hours while it rescans everything and downloads everything. I literally have to leave mine for days to get the info down.
The export/import library option doesn't seem to associate the imported info with the media files until I do a scan which to me defeats the whole purpose and continues to leave me faced with several days of scanning. A key feature of the export/import function should in my opinion be that it must be able to be used without an internet connection. I don't believe this is currently the case.
Also for media that doesn't have any online information (often music concerts seem to fit into this category) it's a real pain having to manually create an xml or nfo file for this, I need to download or make a cover graphic, and find out all the info manually and manually type it in. Effectively all this results in the use of multiple scraping and manual selection techniques for maintaing a single library, not particularly nice or user friendly at all.
I believe it takes an understanding of all these things (and no doubt others I have not thought of) to truly understand the direction the library should be heading in.
The grumpy comment above is an all too unfortunate case these days, some people have ideas, some people can program, some people test, it's the collaboration that makes this work and the willingness to accept someone elses view. Often in open source programmers limit the ideas if they don't agree with them because the ideas people can't enforce an idea to take place. So far XBMC has an excellent track record, let's hope that the amount of requests for this will get through to someone whom can and will actually implement it. I have a feeling that librarys are quite important to the dev crew.