[furii]

i've been trying to compile the latest svn for the last couple days, most recently r30443, to no avail. the last compile i did was r29851 so it's been a while. i'm sure it's a problem on my end because sshcs doesn't seem to have had any problems compiling. over the last few days it has consistently failed after this for me:

Code:

sub-favs-focus.gif
    frame    0                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame    1                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame    2                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame    3                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame    4                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame    5                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame    6                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame    7                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame    8                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame    9                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   10                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   11                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   12                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   13                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   14                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   15                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   16                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   17                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   18                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   19                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   20                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   21                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   22                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   23                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   24                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   25                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   26                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
    frame   27                                ARGB  (128,128 @ 65536 bytes)
white-reflect.png                             ARGB  (435,128 @ 222720 bytes)
PlayerControls-PauseNF.png                    ARGB  (48,48 @ 9216 bytes)
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/xbmc/code/xbmc-trunk/addons/skin.pm3-hd/media'
xbmc@simone:~/code/xbmc-trunk$

unfortunately i don't really have any idea how to troubleshoot what the problem is. is there a log somewhere i might find a clue? my method for upgrading has been

Code:

svn up
make clean
./bootstrap
./configure --prefix=/home/xbmc/build/r(revision)/
make

currently i'm running minimal lucid, up to date according to aptitude. plenty of free space, ram, etc. i didn't notice anything different in the readme.linux or readme.ubuntu files so i'm kind of at a loss.

[davilla]

I don't see any build error, perhaps you could be more clear as to the problem.

[furii]

apparently i'm just retarded i thought when i'd compiled in the past there was some kind of "done" message and the leaving directory message was because of an error. doing make install works just fine.

though now i have another question. it seems some files have been moved around. previously everything was contained in the /share/xbmc/ directory, but now i see things are split between that in /lib/. i'm wondering how i should go about installing this now. before i'd simply rename the /usr/share/xbmc/ directory to it's build number and copy the new build over. can copy the contents of /lib/ to the /share/xbmc/ folder and then copy that to /usr/share/xbmc/ or is there another, better, way?

[davilla]

apparently i'm just retarded i thought when i'd compiled in the past there was some kind of "done" message and the leaving directory message was because of an error. doing make install works just fine.

though now i have another question. it seems some files have been moved around. previously everything was contained in the /share/xbmc/ directory, but now i see things are split between that in /lib/. i'm wondering how i should go about installing this now. before i'd simply rename the /usr/share/xbmc/ directory to it's build number and copy the new build over. can copy the contents of /lib/ to the /share/xbmc/ folder and then copy that to /usr/share/xbmc/ or is there another, better, way?

sudo make install

[furii]

yea, the only problem with that is i like to set the prefix directory as whatever the build number is. makes it easy to revert if something is borked. copying the items in /lib/ to /share/xbmc/ seems to work just fine. probably not the right way, but it's easier than having to pull a specific revision if i want to revert.

[JumJum]

yea, the only problem with that is i like to set the prefix directory as whatever the build number is. makes it easy to revert if something is borked. copying the items in /lib/ to /share/xbmc/ seems to work just fine. probably not the right way, but it's easier than having to pull a specific revision if i want to revert.

Just use 'sudo checkinstall' instead if you're on Ubuntu or Debian. That way you'll have a .deb for each revision you've compiled.

[Deflektor]

I also noticed this. Unlike before, 'make install' now installs some files (including xbmc.bin) into /usr/local/lib/xbmc, regardless of what has been specified with ./configure --prefix=/some/path.

Is this the intended behavior, or is it a bug?

[davilla]

I also noticed this. Unlike before, 'make install' now installs some files (including xbmc.bin) into /usr/local/lib/xbmc, regardless of what has been specified with ./configure --prefix=/some/path.

Is this the intended behavior, or is it a bug?

Intended behavior driven by distro (ubuntu, fedora, debian, etc ) requirements.

[Vladimir]

davilla !
Please, it is possible the instruction for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS /Lucid Lynx on installation svn version?
p.s. Now XBMC v. 28042 lucid . Readme from svn28256.orig.tar.gz- read, but how it is correct to establish xbmc_9.11+svn28256.orig.tar.gz or following?
Excuse for bad English.

[davilla]

davilla !
Please, it is possible the instruction for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS /Lucid Lynx on installation svn version?
p.s. Now XBMC v. 28042 lucid . Readme from svn28256.orig.tar.gz- read, but how it is correct to establish xbmc_9.11+svn28256.orig.tar.gz or following?
Excuse for bad English.

not quite sure what you are asking.