2015-08-26, 13:44
I've been a Kodi user for a while now and have over the last decade (and some) built up a rather large and quite messy music library. And I've had enough of it.
The library, in my naivety it has been managed formerly by Media Player and latterly by iTunes. From now on I intend to do the managing....
I have my weapon of choice for file renaming and tagging, I'm making a Music Vault where a backup of all the tracks will be cleaned and verified to make sure nothing is lost, this will then replace the current library.
If you're still with me, great, I appreciate it.
Her good self is an iTunes shut-in, the house sound system runs from Kodi - I like the interface.
So we have two systems pointing at the same media, this is ok, i've no problem with it really...yet.
So my question is really down to compatibility and best practice. the collection consists of artist only albums, singles, multi disc single artist albums, multi disc and single disc various artist albums, and some home recorded vinyl tracks.
So the plan really is to have a file structure along the lines of
Music> Artist> Album> Tracks (where these are all the single file tracks in that folder not a folder for tr1,2,3)
and the potential for naming convention of Album, album artist, track name, track number
But, where Artist is Various I dislike the way this folder gets really full! But i'll live with it.
What i'm interested in is how the ID3 tags will affect the way the library is viewed in both interfaces. I need it to be as neat as a physical CD collection can be if you had OCDC. (organised CD Collection )
I think what I want to know is, do i need to structure more like Artist>Album>Disc>Tracks ? or is the above acceptable and will the disc number only need to be in the tag not the file structure?
I think the issue stems from multiple tracks that feature on several compilations being file wise un-identifiable
Help!
Can someone offer advice or give examples please?
Thanks you in advance and well done if you got through that ramble!
The library, in my naivety it has been managed formerly by Media Player and latterly by iTunes. From now on I intend to do the managing....
I have my weapon of choice for file renaming and tagging, I'm making a Music Vault where a backup of all the tracks will be cleaned and verified to make sure nothing is lost, this will then replace the current library.
If you're still with me, great, I appreciate it.
Her good self is an iTunes shut-in, the house sound system runs from Kodi - I like the interface.
So we have two systems pointing at the same media, this is ok, i've no problem with it really...yet.
So my question is really down to compatibility and best practice. the collection consists of artist only albums, singles, multi disc single artist albums, multi disc and single disc various artist albums, and some home recorded vinyl tracks.
So the plan really is to have a file structure along the lines of
Music> Artist> Album> Tracks (where these are all the single file tracks in that folder not a folder for tr1,2,3)
and the potential for naming convention of Album, album artist, track name, track number
But, where Artist is Various I dislike the way this folder gets really full! But i'll live with it.
What i'm interested in is how the ID3 tags will affect the way the library is viewed in both interfaces. I need it to be as neat as a physical CD collection can be if you had OCDC. (organised CD Collection )
I think what I want to know is, do i need to structure more like Artist>Album>Disc>Tracks ? or is the above acceptable and will the disc number only need to be in the tag not the file structure?
I think the issue stems from multiple tracks that feature on several compilations being file wise un-identifiable
Help!
Can someone offer advice or give examples please?
Thanks you in advance and well done if you got through that ramble!