(2015-06-07, 11:00)noggin Wrote:

(2015-06-07, 10:18)SABERZAID Wrote: So on my kodi setting shall i change from hardware to software ? Or keep it as hardware ? What about amlogic 812 device if you compare it with chromebox i3 . And nvidia new box . 4k and 2k not important for now as i said cuz i dont hv 4k tv

If you select hardware and play content with a codec that your box can't decode in hardware, it will revert to software decoding. So you should be fine leaving your Intel NUC with hardware decoding enabled. Normally the default settings are good. There are exceptions to this rule, Intel boxes can't hardware decode 1080i VC-1 but can decode 1080p VC-1 - so you need to deselect VC-1 VAAPI if you have interlaced VC-1 content - usually TV series or concert Blu-rays.

If you have an i3 Chromebox and 4K isn't an issue for you, I doubt the Shield offers much to you. The Chromebox will do HD Audio bitstreaming and proper 23.976/24.000/50/59.94/60.00 frame rate switching, whereas the Shield doesn't bitstream HD Audio nor does it appear to do full refresh rate switching?

If your H265 content is within the CPU decode parameters of the i3 in the Chromebox you will be fine. (The Celeron Chromebox has more limitations in this regard than the i3 Model)

(2015-06-07, 14:29)SABERZAID Wrote:

(2015-06-07, 11:00)noggin Wrote:

(2015-06-07, 10:18)SABERZAID Wrote: So on my kodi setting shall i change from hardware to software ? Or keep it as hardware ? What about amlogic 812 device if you compare it with chromebox i3 . And nvidia new box . 4k and 2k not important for now as i said cuz i dont hv 4k tv

If you select hardware and play content with a codec that your box can't decode in hardware, it will revert to software decoding. So you should be fine leaving your Intel NUC with hardware decoding enabled. Normally the default settings are good. There are exceptions to this rule, Intel boxes can't hardware decode 1080i VC-1 but can decode 1080p VC-1 - so you need to deselect VC-1 VAAPI if you have interlaced VC-1 content - usually TV series or concert Blu-rays.

If you have an i3 Chromebox and 4K isn't an issue for you, I doubt the Shield offers much to you. The Chromebox will do HD Audio bitstreaming and proper 23.976/24.000/50/59.94/60.00 frame rate switching, whereas the Shield doesn't bitstream HD Audio nor does it appear to do full refresh rate switching?

If your H265 content is within the CPU decode parameters of the i3 in the Chromebox you will be fine. (The Celeron Chromebox has more limitations in this regard than the i3 Model)

thanks bro

you said here :

If your H265 content is within the CPU decode parameters of the i3 in the Chromebox you will be fine. (The Celeron Chromebox has more limitations in this regard than the i3 Model)

so shall i order the celeron ver instead of intel i3 ? for feature plan etc, and who's better in terms of performance etc ?

(2015-06-07, 14:44)noggin Wrote:

(2015-06-07, 14:29)SABERZAID Wrote:

(2015-06-07, 11:00)noggin Wrote: If you select hardware and play content with a codec that your box can't decode in hardware, it will revert to software decoding. So you should be fine leaving your Intel NUC with hardware decoding enabled. Normally the default settings are good. There are exceptions to this rule, Intel boxes can't hardware decode 1080i VC-1 but can decode 1080p VC-1 - so you need to deselect VC-1 VAAPI if you have interlaced VC-1 content - usually TV series or concert Blu-rays.

If you have an i3 Chromebox and 4K isn't an issue for you, I doubt the Shield offers much to you. The Chromebox will do HD Audio bitstreaming and proper 23.976/24.000/50/59.94/60.00 frame rate switching, whereas the Shield doesn't bitstream HD Audio nor does it appear to do full refresh rate switching?

If your H265 content is within the CPU decode parameters of the i3 in the Chromebox you will be fine. (The Celeron Chromebox has more limitations in this regard than the i3 Model)

thanks bro

you said here :

If your H265 content is within the CPU decode parameters of the i3 in the Chromebox you will be fine. (The Celeron Chromebox has more limitations in this regard than the i3 Model)

so shall i order the celeron ver instead of intel i3 ? for feature plan etc, and who's better in terms of performance etc ?

It all depends how important H265 content is to you. The Celeron Chromebox is great for non-HEVC content, and will play some with software decode, but the i3 model will do better with software decoding (i.e. cope with higher bitrate)

However I have not used a Chromebox i3 and can't comment on its relative value for money in comparison to other i3 boxes like a NUC etc.

I thought you already had an i3 Chromebox so must have been confused by one of your posts. I wasn't recommending buying the i3 Chromebox, just commenting that it might do relatively OK with software decode HEVC.

Personally I'd still not buy an Android box as my main HTPC because of the limitations that platform and the implementations on it seem to have.

(2015-06-07, 18:30)kenofstephen Wrote: Tegra 4 decodes video terribly, hope this X1 is improved.

(2015-06-07, 14:49)SABERZAID Wrote:

(2015-06-07, 14:44)noggin Wrote:

(2015-06-07, 14:29)SABERZAID Wrote: thanks bro

you said here :

If your H265 content is within the CPU decode parameters of the i3 in the Chromebox you will be fine. (The Celeron Chromebox has more limitations in this regard than the i3 Model)

so shall i order the celeron ver instead of intel i3 ? for feature plan etc, and who's better in terms of performance etc ?

It all depends how important H265 content is to you. The Celeron Chromebox is great for non-HEVC content, and will play some with software decode, but the i3 model will do better with software decoding (i.e. cope with higher bitrate)

However I have not used a Chromebox i3 and can't comment on its relative value for money in comparison to other i3 boxes like a NUC etc.

I thought you already had an i3 Chromebox so must have been confused by one of your posts. I wasn't recommending buying the i3 Chromebox, just commenting that it might do relatively OK with software decode HEVC.

Personally I'd still not buy an Android box as my main HTPC because of the limitations that platform and the implementations on it seem to have.

yes i have chromebox with i3 and the new nuc device , and i want to buy another box for my other room , thats why i ask , the other room will watch movies, 3d via addons etc, so in this case what box is the best option , i3 or celeron ?

(2015-06-08, 21:13)Martijn Wrote: We already knew that
Though we probably need some adjustments on Kodi side as well for that.

(2015-06-08, 16:32)essential Wrote: Does anyone have a Ceton tuner? If so does it work at all with the Live Channels app or the HDHomeRun app? I'm curious to see if it'll recognize any network tuner or if it's locked to HDHomeRun. I have a Ceton InfiniTV 6 ETH that I have yet to open, and if it's verified it doesn't work with the Shield I'll likely sell it and buy a HDHomeRun tuner, which sucks because I'd have to buy two 3-tuner devices to match the Ceton. I plan on replacing my DVR's with 500gb Shields if they allow recording to the 500GB harddrive through the LiveChannels/HDHomeRun apps ... just hoping it also works with the Ceton.

(2015-06-08, 21:21)hifiaudio2 Wrote: I just hope "We do provide frequent Software Upgrades on SHIELD products so you can expect features and functionality to expand over the upcoming months" does not mean that I will be waiting months for lossless audio or 23.976 support!