2013-09-09, 21:06
(2013-09-09, 15:56)Koying Wrote: I realize we have 2 notions: "share" and "source".
Shares are basically anything we can reach, while sources are the association of a share and a scrapper.
The proper way seem to be the creation of a "shares://" VFS...
I don't suppose we could axe the whole sources.xml thing and just use the video/music/etc DBs for sources/shares? It always seemed odd to me that it's so easy to get in a situation where you can remove a share, but the source that gets scraped/updated can remain. Users wonder how certain folders still get scanned for library updates, even though they believe they've been removed. The source can easily remain "orphaned" in the DB, with no clear cut way to access it, as only "shares" are listed in the GUI.
I'm not sure if that's within the scope of this discussion/work, but I thought I'd bring it up.
