2013-09-29, 01:21
(2013-09-29, 00:09)Chortos-2 Wrote: And magao, \be and \blur arguments are far from equivalent. As it happens, just recently I did some (mathematical) experiments with \be and \blur, and here’s the conversion formula I obtained: \be argument = (\blur argument)^2 * 8 / log(256). So for \blur3 you actually want \be13!
Hey - I only learned about \be and \blur yesterday
I'll change my snippet to use the algorithm you've supplied. It appears you mean the natural logarithm of 256. Does it also hold for \blur arguments < 1 e.g. \blur0.5 ~= \be0.35 (which would be converted to \be1 since \be needs to be integer and any non-zero \blur should become a non-zero \be)?
