2015-01-28, 10:07
OK, nickr
Since you want to change this topic to a GPL topic, then let's talk about it.
We have no right to open the source code of Allwinner under the agreement, so please give us the detailed evidence to prove that Allwinner violated the GPL.
Just because they didn't open the source code then you call them GPL violator? You're too naive.
GPL is complex, it's not simply YES or NO.
I suggest you to ask the official people of Allwinner for collecting some evidence and then back to here to tell us about your findings.
Since you want to change this topic to a GPL topic, then let's talk about it.
We have no right to open the source code of Allwinner under the agreement, so please give us the detailed evidence to prove that Allwinner violated the GPL.
Just because they didn't open the source code then you call them GPL violator? You're too naive.
GPL is complex, it's not simply YES or NO.
I suggest you to ask the official people of Allwinner for collecting some evidence and then back to here to tell us about your findings.
