ACCEPTED: On-the-Fly Transcoding
#27
(2015-03-26, 21:39)Koying Wrote: I would be very, very disappointed if this project would be endangered by f...ing FLAC.

lol. I think we're all on the same page here. The important thing is the transcoding. Everyone agrees FLAC would be nice to have maybe, but that can happen at any time after the initial work is done. For now, keeping it simple is absolutely the most important thing.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
ACCEPTED: On-the-Fly Transcoding - by mANm - 2015-03-16, 22:37
RE: Proposal - On-the-Fly Transcoding - by natethomas - 2015-03-26, 22:10
RE: ACCEPTED: On-the-Fly Transcoding - by zag - 2015-07-04, 18:22
RE: ACCEPTED: On-the-Fly Transcoding - by zag - 2015-09-01, 23:51
RE: ACCEPTED: On-the-Fly Transcoding - by zag - 2015-09-22, 10:27
RE: ACCEPTED: On-the-Fly Transcoding - by zag - 2015-09-22, 11:30
RE: ACCEPTED: On-the-Fly Transcoding - by zag - 2015-09-22, 14:05
RE: ACCEPTED: On-the-Fly Transcoding - by zag - 2015-10-22, 10:57
RE: ACCEPTED: On-the-Fly Transcoding - by zag - 2016-03-03, 11:09
RE: ACCEPTED: On-the-Fly Transcoding - by zag - 2016-03-03, 14:36
RE: ACCEPTED: On-the-Fly Transcoding - by bry - 2016-08-22, 03:37
Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
ACCEPTED: On-the-Fly Transcoding1