2015-03-27, 09:23
I did a test using my laptop with an HD 3000 as the renderer comparing the image output by DSPlayer and MPC-HC with madVR. As you can see, the images are identical.
These are JPEGs not uncompressed PNGs, so this comparison is not of rendering quality. Also, the images were saved for web performance, so minute differences may exist between the two due to the use of dithering. But the takeaway is there appears to be no limitations or unwanted modification of the image by DSPlayer when rendering an image versus the reference player, Media Player Classic. Both rendering performance and image quality remain intact.
Intel HD 3000 madVR settings:
DSPlayer & madVR
MPC-HC + LAV Filters & madVR
DSPlayer & madVR
MPC-HC + LAV Filters & madVR
These are JPEGs not uncompressed PNGs, so this comparison is not of rendering quality. Also, the images were saved for web performance, so minute differences may exist between the two due to the use of dithering. But the takeaway is there appears to be no limitations or unwanted modification of the image by DSPlayer when rendering an image versus the reference player, Media Player Classic. Both rendering performance and image quality remain intact.
Intel HD 3000 madVR settings:
- Chroma: Bicubic100 + AR
- Image: Lanczos3 + AR
- Artifact Removal: Off
- Dithering: Ordered
DSPlayer & madVR
MPC-HC + LAV Filters & madVR
DSPlayer & madVR
MPC-HC + LAV Filters & madVR
