Working on an Executor to replace Job* functionality
#4
If you can replace all that, that's great! but there's a lot of old awfulness using those things. That's why it might be better to start with adding alternative api, move things over and then replace it. E.g two things we don't have any replacement for yes is cancellation and progress. I doubt this will part of any executor api so uncoupling that from the job manager system might be a place to start.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Working on an Executor to replace Job* functionality - by takoi - 2018-02-05, 23:12
Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
Working on an Executor to replace Job* functionality0