2010-12-16, 03:12
Kode Wrote:Moderators correct me if I'm wrong, but we get a lot of submissions that when they are denied, the original author doesn't take on board the comments, fix the issues and reupload.
Looking at the denied list on lockstock and the denied list on fanart.tv, I'm wondering if there is a better way to deal with denied logos, as some of them are very close to being acceptable.
Perhaps when a users image is denied, they have a week to resubmit, after that their image is put on public display with the reasons for it being denied and anyone can have a go at replacing it.
Any thoughts?
Also, when an image is denied, my thinking is if the user replaces the image it replaces the one in the denied list, it goes back through the moderation queue and is treated as a new submission. This will hopefully cut down the denied list and encourage people to fix crappy images.
This is one of the many reasons that I don't even bother filling in the denial box on some days. If it's a logo from a known member that uploads lots of logos they get a nice filled in message from me 90% of the time. However if the uploader is FredJones0002 (aka some unknown noob) there is almost no chance of him/her even bothering to read the notices. In fact he/she will continue to upload the same shit image over an over again until I get irate and start threatening the lives of his family members. I've been all for releasing the junk logos to the public since day one because there are a few dozen in there that could have been fixed very easily. :p Btw I still want a wall of shame. ^_^