Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
Why dont you compile from source?, after all xvba is far (very far) from any standard XBMC code (not to discount any xvba pre 12.2 wont need testing either) and that topic is for code which is pulled into the Frodo, if anything not to skew any testing the ppa would be for Testing inbetween stable releases. Right?
uNi
Posts: 5,174
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation:
97
Kib
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 5,174
2013-04-11, 23:02
(This post was last modified: 2013-04-11, 23:04 by Kib.)
Well I have never done it, and I just wondered if wsnipex would be able to make a 12.2 version (either with or without xvba) as there is none made yet, so XBMC 12.2 issues under Ubuntu might not be picked up on.
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
2013-04-11, 23:05
(This post was last modified: 2013-04-11, 23:09 by un1versal.)
Very easy see 3rd link on my signature, just use frodo bransh instead of master and compiles are us
So instead of
git clone git://github.com/xbmc/xbmc.git
it would be
git clone -b frodo git://github.com/xbmc/xbmc.git
uNi
Posts: 7,135
Joined: Oct 2012
un1versal
Out of Memory (1939–2016)
Posts: 7,135
Yes I agree, I asked in other thread because its the standard code which is really supported by the team and where its ontopic and whats being asked to be tested, the xvba is only supported by fernet iirc
In either case Linux builds are always "forgotten" and especially the Ubuntu/XBMCbuntu stuff.
I did point to third link on my sig that removes the figuring out part out of the compile and gave you the replacement gitclone for xvba git source instead.
it would be easier if the ppas provided builds though however in this case a particular ppa would have to be created (given nature of inbetween 12.2 and because existing testing ppas have v13 pre code in and wont accept a v12 code upload) and many users still dont know what a ppa is and dont read wiki or bother much with testing anything that hasnt been released.
uNi
Posts: 7,650
Joined: Jun 2011
Reputation:
287
I'll see if I can put up a ppa with 12.2 testing next week, but probably only mainline.
Posts: 191
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
7
Begall
Senior Member
Posts: 191
2013-04-14, 19:31
(This post was last modified: 2013-04-14, 19:54 by Begall.)
You're right that it's something to do with the Tvheadend demux code, as I've just checked and recordings will play back fine, even on HD videos with a lot of movement. However, downgrading to the previous XBMC/addon package hasn't helped, so I'm guessing it's something to do with the server.
Edit: In retrospect that makes no sense. Clearly the data being sent from the server is fine, as it records with no problems. It's something in the TVH playback, but if that's the case I don't understand why dropping back to 12.1/1.6.19 didn't help. Either way, dropping back from 3.5 git master TVH to the latest 3.4 beta code didn't help.
Posts: 6,810
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
198
DVD playback never uses hw acceleration.
Posts: 662
Joined: Jan 2007
Reputation:
7
Any thoughts about 13.0 Alpha gives only 24fps in GUI with Resolution set to 1080p 50Hz?
ASRock Beebox J3160 4GB RAM 120GB SATA SSD - Harmony Elite BT
Intel NUC Kit DN2820FYKH 4GB RAM 120GB SATA SSD - Harmony Smart Control BT
all @ Libreelec
Testbuild
HP N54L @ Ubuntu 14.04.4 Minimal Server / MySQL DB
HP N40L @ Ubuntu 14.04.4 Minimal Server