Posts: 30
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
0
So,
I'm looking at using an HDHomeRun for my tuner (Digital Antenna - no cable or the like), and thinking of using my main gaming PC (Windows 8.1, pretty decent specs, but not earth shattering) to run the PVR backend (Likely MediaPortal, but perhaps Argus... Don't know).
I am concerned, however, that it will take up too many resources, or be otherwise "flaky" while we're doing whatever else (games, internet, videos, ..., ..., ...)
So, how much overhead do these PVR backends take? Need to know before I buy (unfortunately), because if it's too much, I might change from an unRAID server to a Windows 8 server in the basement (using Storage Spaces) in order to ensure that I can run the PVR software there. (Or, maybe some other form of Linux mass-storage combined with a Linux PVR backend... Unsure...)
Thoughts?
Posts: 459
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
14
I'm running Mediaportal backend on a relatively low powered Celeron G1610 (Win7). Resource usage is low unless you are recording/watching live or streaming to clients/updating EPG.
Having said that, I'm using the Sky-UK EPG grabber which I think is much more resource hungry than normal EPG grabber.
If you plan on streaming to (other) TV clients or recording while gaming, then I suggest a separate box. Otherwise I think you will be ok - worst case you schedule EPG updates for a specific (non-gaming) time of day.
Posts: 30
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
0
Hmmm. Thanks for the info!
Typically, my gaming time overlaps recording time, typically of 2 streams. It's starting to sound like I'm going to need to switch away from unRAID... Anybody else?
Posts: 19,982
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
451
nickr
Retired Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 19,982
A PVR backend shouldn't require much resources. It is just dumping a stream to disk. No processing required beyond extracting 2 or 3 streams from a mux of many streams and plonking it to disk.
So it is mainly disk IO intensive, and that function is pretty critical.
Frankly I would get a second hand dual core computer and run mythtv. My Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz with 4G ram breaks no sweat recording up to 5 streams at a time off an HDHR. It cost me a couple of hundred dollars (in NZ where IT hardware is expensive compared to the US) plus the hard drives.
If I have helped you or increased your knowledge, click the 'thumbs up' button to give thanks :) (People with less than 20 posts won't see the "thumbs up" button.)
Posts: 30
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation:
0
Hmmm. Interesting. That matches (mostly) the specs of a laptop I have sitting around. Hadn't considered using that, but maybe I should.
Posts: 2,064
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
34
prae5
Team-XBMC Forum Moderator
Posts: 2,064
It should be very little cpu, assuming you aren't doing any transcoding or anything like that. Plenty of people running backend on raspberry pi's, atoms, etc...
Its all disk/network io.
Posts: 19,982
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
451
nickr
Retired Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 19,982
Plus a lot of database writes on mythtv, perhaps not on other backends.
And of course it depends how many streams you are recording at a time!
If I have helped you or increased your knowledge, click the 'thumbs up' button to give thanks :) (People with less than 20 posts won't see the "thumbs up" button.)
