(2015-05-26, 17:39)Koying Wrote: BTW, the Vero is a business, so it makes perfect business sense to not provide an OSMC images for non-Vero IMX'es (there *really* would be no point to buy it, then).
OTOH, OSMC plays fair game and all sources are available. If someone with some knowledge would care enough, it would be trivial to build an OSMC image for whatever Cubox'es...
We will release an iMX6 version of OSMC. We have not done so yet because we also wanted to include other devices (Wandboard, UDOO, Utilite) etc but will soon with a unified SPL U-Boot. We held back on this because we want to support all i.MX6 boards at once. Other i.MX6 devices aren't a threat to the Vero because they don't provide the same experience (IMHO -- but let us worry about that).
(2015-05-26, 19:17)zaphod24 Wrote: On the osmc.tv site it says that eventually they will release an image for generic imx6 devices. I get focusing on the device that some were willing to pay $200 for. Those folks should, after all, get first priority. I'm not sure why they couldn't put a generic imx6 image out there from the start, but... It guess it may have become time consuming if generic imx6 users started having a lot of issues and asking questions.
As it stands, there are easy to follow instructions in the Kodi/XBMC SolidRun forums for loading OSMC onto a Cubox-i or Hummingboard. I followed them and was able to get OSMC working just fine on my i2. It pretty much worked like every other Kodi distro I've tried on my i2 (geexbox, openelec, arch, xbian) except with a new snazzy theme. Most content played ok but my 1080i60 live TV content and some of the test videos from fritsch had some skipping or dropped frames.
It's a free market and you can buy what you like. Being able to buy the CuBox at the price you paid is great, but there's a reason why you're in this situation now where you're not able to use your device to its proper potential. I hope OSMC with the work of the imx6 devs can help improve it for some users and that's what we'll try and do.
(2015-05-26, 21:26)jjd-uk Wrote: It's not a custom remote either, just $2 off the shelf one from a chinese manufacturer.
I'm interested in how you came to that conclusion. Inductive fallacy.
The remote has an OSMC logo on it, which should instantly reveal that it's certainly not obtainable off the shelf. Our graphics team actually designed all of the icons on the remote and put a great deal of time and effort in to making it visually appealing and have a good feel to it. I did the work on the remote codes. I'd love it if we could could grab this remote at this level of quality for $2 (and pass the savings on to the customer), but sadly that's not possible. A good battery that does not die after a month, and is branded (and therefore pertinent to a degree of reliability) is at least $1. The remote itself was subject to tooling fees during development and is subject to minimum order quantities with a long lead time.
Re. China comment. Argumentum ad populum.
You have 'UK' in your name, so you probably know that the UK does not make much anymore and what we do make is not done in a timely manner. Our power supplies which we buy from a UK company (that incidentally also manufacture the official Raspberry Pi power supplies) come with a 24 week lead time and they're still assembled in China. Long lead times are particularly punishing because you have to get demand right.
There's a lot that's been assumed in this thread and this discussion seems to be circular. Ad finitum e silentio!
And that's pretty much all I have to say on the matter.
S