2018-08-19, 09:38
(2018-08-19, 09:19)wesk05 Wrote:Well, I have based my judgement on this previous post, and on the pictures also here, as you can read it identifies and discriminates in a rather opposite way between bad and wrong result. I thought that if you get more tiny and more separated blocks, than it's closer to the good result, and if it show less separated and huger blocks, or just rather columns than it's rather worst. Or I just didn't get it right how to conclude the difference?(2018-08-19, 06:37)Mount81 Wrote: So what would be your opinion and conclusion here regarding which has just dithering and which may have true 10bit?Vero 4K and LE-S905X are the good ones. The patterns that you see are due to rounding errors. CE-S905X is actually the worst. It is actually 8-bit with dithering. CE-S912 is 10-bit with dithering. If there wasn't dithering CE-S192 will also look like Vero 4K and LE.
Did you switched ON that "manual 10 bit" option in OSMC?
Yes, 10-bit mode was enabled for Vero 4K.
(2018-08-19, 09:07)atomizasser Wrote: Which version of CE was used?8.95.0 release
Edit: taking a closer look, now I see what you mean. S912 and CE-S905X have some "noisy" patterns, with some color fibrillation and fragmentation in them and not so homogenous colored blocks. That may be the sign of the bad dithering? No such mentioned in the Quants2D test's original page, it just differentiates them by the size and, number of the blocks, columns.