•   
  • 1
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17(current)
Looking to Build Your Very First unRAID Server?
(2016-01-27, 16:05)danny1 Wrote: Trying to decide between UnRaid and FreeNas. Anybody have opinion as to which one is better?

1st: Do both meet your requirements? Unraid is way more versatile.
2nd: ZFS vs. unraid
3rd: budget - freenas is more demanding

ZFS is absolutely great but an unraid server can easily be upgraded in storage by just plugging in an additional disk or just swap one disk by another bigger one.

In ZFS you will need to replace all disks in you pool with bigger ones oder add another pool what means at least 2 disks. But more woul make more sense.

When Freenas is meeting your requirements and you have the money go for freenas. ZFS is great!

e.g. Start with 8 equal disks in raidZ2 (Raid6) and when you need more space add another 8 disks or replace all 8. Today with disks greater 4TB I'd always use 2 parity disks (URE).

regards
Joachim
Reply
I haven't used zfs or freenas but have been using unraid for several years.

Unraid was already a very mature and flexible server os, but in the last year alone they added a ton of new functionality like kvm, docker and cache pool. Next version will add dual parity (currently in closed beta).

Also within the last couple of years unraid/limetech as a company grew and added some top notch people who spearheaded some of the new developments.

I would highly recommend it
Reply
While I personally like unRaid and have 3 Pro Servers running at my Dads place, at home I switched to Snapraid and a Windows Server (runs on Linux too).
It's similar to unRaid, except that it is not a complete OS, just a normal Application and instead of Real-Time protection it uses Snapshots. This has both Pros and Cons but for me the Pros far outweight any Cons. The biggest gripe I had with unRaid was that it uses ReiserFS.
Reply
(2016-02-06, 11:02)falc410 Wrote: The biggest gripe I had with unRaid was that it uses ReiserFS.

That is no longer the case. The slew of new features added over the last 1-2 years include support for other file systems like xfs and butterfs. The best part is, just like hdd sizes, you can mix and match different file systems, too.

I switched all my data drives to xfs about a year ago
Reply
(2016-02-06, 16:23)aptalca Wrote:
(2016-02-06, 11:02)falc410 Wrote: The biggest gripe I had with unRaid was that it uses ReiserFS.

That is no longer the case. The slew of new features added over the last 1-2 years include support for other file systems like xfs and butterfs. The best part is, just like hdd sizes, you can mix and match different file systems, too.

I switched all my data drives to xfs about a year ago

Interesting. Had no idea.
Reply
Me neither. That's good to hear. I tested unRaid Version 5.x, apparently a lot changed with 6.x. I'm still running 5.x at my fathers place without any problems but he just leaves the boxes running 24x7. At home I need suspend S3 and Wake-on-LAN and I had issues with this as well. For some reason that seems more stable under Windows than Linux. I also like the automated Windows Client Backup, thus I have a Server 2012 R2 Essentials at home (well I got the license from the university, otherwise it would have been too expensive I guess). Still I recommend looking at snapraid as well - if for some reason you need a different distribution than slackware (unRaid).
Reply
(2016-02-08, 14:51)falc410 Wrote: At home I need suspend S3 and Wake-on-LAN and I had issues with this as well. For some reason that seems more stable under Windows than Linux.

Under windows the vendors are fixing their broken ACPI tables by drivers.

Regards
Joachim
Reply
Cheers!!!! for unRAID Big GrinWink
Reply
(2016-04-20, 06:04)Beer40oz Wrote: Cheers!!!! for unRAID Big GrinWink

+1
1: Nvidia Shield TV (2017) 16GB - 2: Beelink MinixMXIII II - 3: Beelink MinixMXIII II - 4: Beelink MinixMXIII II
NAS: unRAID 6.3 Pro • Case (NZXT H440) • MB (MBD-X7SBE with SIM1U+) • CPU (Xeon X3360) • RAM (4x2GB DDR2) • SATA (6 On MB, 8 AOC-SAT2-MV8) • PSU (EVGA SUPERNOVA 650 G2) • HDD (2 x Toshiba 3TB parity, 6 x WD Red 3TB xfs, 1 x 512GB SSD cache)  • UPS (APC BR1000G)
Reply
My solution was a bit different.
The base machine is an old Z170 board with a Pentium G3450; it manages a 12 HDD RAID6 using software raid (controller is a LSI SAS 2008 plus a 16 port SAS expander, €60 on eBay).
The MD raid is then mounted via iSCSI/RDMA (over a 10GBE twinax "crossover") on a (smaller but powerful) linux server that does filesystem management (XFS), shares and the like.

It might seem a bit overkill but it's actually cheap, it's damn expandable and it's great gym to work with linux and networking.
Network cards are an old Mellanox ConnectX-2 (they are pretty cheap, same goes for the twinax cable) and a bit more expensive Marvell (that has two connectors instead of one).
Reply
  •   
  • 1
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17(current)
 
Thread Rating:
  • 16 Vote(s) - 3.81 Average



Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
Looking to Build Your Very First unRAID Server?3.8116