Posts: 17,405
Joined: Aug 2007
Reputation:
586
Hitcher
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 17,405
OK different approach -
How about making it a ListItem.Overlay object?
That way we could kill two birds with one stone by not having to use conditions if the skinner wants the movie set image in the same place as the un/watched overlay, and/or use <visible>StringCompare(ListItem.Overlay,OverlaySet.png)</visible> to determine if the item is a set.
Thanks.
Posts: 672
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation:
13
pieh
Retired Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 672
Hitcher:
This won't be added before eden in any form. I try to focus on bugfixing right now. Bump this topic after release please.
Always read the XBMC online-manual, FAQ and search the forums before posting.
Do NOT e-mail Team-XBMC members asking for support. Read/follow the forum rules.
For troubleshooting and bug reporting, make sure you read this first
My previous forum/trac nickname: grajen3
Posts: 17,405
Joined: Aug 2007
Reputation:
586
Hitcher
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 17,405
<visible>!StringCompare(ListItem.Label,..) + ListItem.IsFolder + Container.Content(Movies) + SubString(Container.Folderpath,videodb://,left)</visible>
The StringCompare check is so it doesn't show up for the parent folder, and the SubString check is so it doesn't show up for addons that contain movies and folders.
Posts: 17,405
Joined: Aug 2007
Reputation:
586
Hitcher
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 17,405
I can't say I have on my PCs but you never know.
Ideally I'd like smarter visibility checks where if a group check fails XBMC then ignores all the other checks inside that group and simply goes to the next check. That way we wouldn't have to worry about having lots of them in one section.