Posts: 3,660
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation:
93
Jeroen
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 3,660
Would be nice if we could somehow create a dummy/fake device so that we don't have to skin it "blind".
Posts: 18,085
Joined: Aug 2007
Reputation:
696
Hitcher
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 18,085
Couldn't they have used existing dialogs?
Posts: 3,956
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
62
Well, if it's used just for that and there's no easy way to test the skinning than I guess the users can switch to Confluence for setting it up.
Posts: 5,292
Joined: Jun 2006
Reputation:
62
Jezz_X
Team-XBMC Skinner
Posts: 5,292
If you try a build from a month ago that xml ronie posted should work because its been changed later to disable the setting if no valid devices are found
Posts: 2,441
Joined: Apr 2009
Reputation:
73
`Black
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 2,441
The xml still works fine for testing the dialogs with the latest build, at least on OS X.
Posts: 15,282
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
738
ronie
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 15,282
make sure you stick the xml i've posted in the dir where xbmc is installed,
not in your userdata folder.
Posts: 3,956
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
62
And the right location on OS X is where exactly? Black?