2013-10-05, 11:59
that is correct, even though L5.2 was "only" added in June 2011. Its just AMDs drivers that have this limit, Intel decodes 4k as well.
(2012-08-25, 14:03)Tobby Wrote: Are there actually monitors using that res under $10,000?
(2013-10-05, 11:46)jpsdr Wrote: According H264 spec (Rec. ITU-T H.264 (01/2012) p301), max resolution for H264 L5.2 is [email protected]. So, H264 spec allow greater than 2048x2048.Sorry, I got this info from Microsoft website and used it without checking the specs directly. My bad. So it's only the AMD drivers that are limited to 2048x2048 using whatever h264 profiile (4.1).
(2013-10-05, 05:14)DJ_Izumi Wrote:(2013-10-05, 04:27)davilla Wrote: Because it's not safe for all flavors. We don't want XBMC to be crashing on random user content. Maybe in the future as more work is done but right now, it's not safe.
Okay, well, then can you explain the following situation?
With DXVA disabled, 1080p 8bit h.264 is played multi-threaded. However, 4k 8bit h.264 is decoded single threaded. ...Why is it 'safe' for 1080p but not 4k?
(2013-11-09, 21:39)lallhands Wrote: Intel NUC 4K!
http://www.engadget.com/2013/09/13/intel...ng-hd5000/