Why not WMC as backend?

Why not WMC as backend?

spyder
Fan

Posts: 432
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 5

spyder
Fan
Posts: 432

#74

2013-02-08, 17:40

(2013-02-08, 15:54)FIBO Wrote: (@krustyreturns) managed that for the recording and EPG, but not for the live TV.

Just a suggestion, not sure if it has been thought of/brought up/possible, but what about bypassing WMC for live tv? Clicking on a program and linking that directly to the tuner/stream. This would allow you to use the xbmc buffer to pause live tv, and if possible you could have wmc switch channels(in the background) so that you could still hit record and it would start from when you changed channels.

Messages In This Thread

Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-04, 17:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 18:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-04, 18:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 23:02

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-05, 00:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jajoflo - 2012-09-05, 02:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-05, 04:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 00:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-06, 01:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by debennett2 - 2013-01-23, 21:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-01-24, 06:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 02:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-10-29, 05:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-10-29, 16:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-06, 04:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by joebrady - 2012-09-06, 05:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-18, 15:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-21, 01:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-23, 17:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-23, 18:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kreeturez - 2012-09-24, 00:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-24, 00:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-24, 01:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-24, 01:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 15:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-26, 16:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 17:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-27, 10:26

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-09-27, 12:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-01, 04:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-10-02, 21:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-02, 23:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by DJShadow - 2012-10-12, 19:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ebucha - 2012-10-17, 21:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by benoire - 2012-10-22, 08:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Crimzin - 2012-10-24, 23:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by T800 - 2012-10-25, 08:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by svet-am - 2012-10-29, 15:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2012-10-17, 21:31

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-10-17, 21:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by sub3 - 2012-10-22, 17:39

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-01-24, 17:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-01-24, 19:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-01-31, 16:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-01, 20:35

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-01, 20:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-01, 22:14

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 01:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-02, 19:56

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 20:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-02, 21:08

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 21:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-02, 22:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-03, 20:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-03, 22:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-03, 23:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-03, 23:39

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Hijo del sol - 2013-02-04, 04:21

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 10:21

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-04, 17:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 18:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-04, 18:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jrichards52081 - 2013-02-05, 04:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-05, 05:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by emveepee - 2013-02-05, 04:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bmn001 - 2013-02-05, 20:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-06, 11:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-06, 18:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-08, 20:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 17:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-06, 18:41

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-06, 18:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-06, 19:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-07, 04:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 21:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-08, 15:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-08, 17:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-08, 20:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-02-09, 16:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-09, 19:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-10, 11:52

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by papreston - 2013-02-10, 15:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2013-02-10, 16:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-10, 16:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-11, 05:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-11, 06:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jrichards52081 - 2013-02-12, 01:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-12, 02:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-11, 13:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-12, 04:09

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-12, 08:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-12, 14:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-12, 10:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-12, 13:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-13, 05:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 14:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-14, 17:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-02-15, 05:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-15, 05:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 20:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-14, 21:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 17:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-16, 19:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 21:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-02-20, 00:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-20, 03:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-20, 15:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-20, 20:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-21, 02:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-21, 15:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-03, 05:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 05:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-03, 05:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 20:51

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-12, 21:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 21:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 06:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-03, 08:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 10:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-04, 15:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-03-05, 08:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mrkevbo - 2013-03-10, 23:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-11, 02:39

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-03-11, 04:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-11, 17:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Tyzing - 2013-03-11, 21:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-12, 10:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-12, 13:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-12, 19:43

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 01:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-13, 03:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 12:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 03:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-13, 04:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 16:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-13, 17:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 19:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-15, 01:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-15, 23:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 12:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 18:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-14, 17:24

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 21:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 21:51

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-14, 00:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-14, 03:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-03-15, 04:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-15, 04:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-03-15, 05:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-15, 16:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 07:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-09-22, 15:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Angelscry - 2013-09-22, 15:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 21:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-22, 18:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-18, 19:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-19, 00:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-19, 00:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-19, 16:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 16:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-22, 18:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 01:02

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ConfusedTA - 2013-03-19, 14:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by deletedpenguin - 2013-03-19, 21:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-22, 14:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-03-21, 10:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-03-22, 06:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by d3maxt - 2013-03-22, 17:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by deletedpenguin - 2013-03-23, 02:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 09:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-23, 10:09

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-23, 17:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 18:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-23, 18:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by username145 - 2013-03-24, 00:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-24, 04:39

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-24, 23:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-25, 05:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 06:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-25, 16:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-25, 09:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-25, 11:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by VladTepz - 2013-03-25, 12:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 19:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-03-25, 22:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-26, 17:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-26, 17:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-03-28, 05:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-29, 16:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 19:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-29, 19:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 22:48

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-30, 00:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-30, 18:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-30, 00:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-30, 21:59

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by deletedpenguin - 2013-03-30, 11:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by moniker - 2013-03-31, 01:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-03-31, 03:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-04-02, 21:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-04, 10:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by justinobwi - 2013-04-04, 18:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-05, 01:40

Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by tekno - 2013-04-09, 07:56

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-09, 17:26

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-04-09, 17:49

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by rtwolfe - 2013-04-10, 04:34

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-10, 16:36

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-04-10, 21:55

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-04-11, 06:48

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-04-11, 17:01

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-04-12, 17:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Slappa - 2013-04-09, 13:09

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-04-10, 05:59

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-04-10, 23:41

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-04-15, 16:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MyClosedEyes - 2013-04-17, 05:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by tcs2tx - 2013-04-19, 00:48

Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-24, 13:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-24, 16:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-04-24, 20:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-25, 08:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-04-29, 21:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Neebski - 2013-04-30, 18:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-30, 19:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-05-06, 03:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-06, 07:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-06, 13:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-05-06, 16:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-08, 16:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-08, 16:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 19:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-06, 19:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by micster - 2013-05-06, 21:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-07, 12:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-05-07, 15:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-07, 16:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-05-07, 22:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-05-08, 20:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-09, 19:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-05-08, 23:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 23:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-10, 00:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-14, 02:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-21, 22:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-12, 20:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-05-13, 07:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-13, 08:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rap777 - 2013-05-13, 10:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Bladed - 2013-05-21, 01:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Mankix - 2013-05-22, 17:58

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-22, 19:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-22, 20:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-05-22, 23:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-05-23, 00:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 00:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 02:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 04:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 04:59

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 06:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 09:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 09:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-05-23, 17:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 19:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 21:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by locoguano - 2013-05-24, 04:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 17:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 19:01

Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-28, 17:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-28, 19:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-28, 22:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 23:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 00:04

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-29, 00:03

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 01:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 01:53

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 02:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 04:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-29, 05:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 07:03

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-29, 07:30

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-30, 03:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-30, 22:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-02, 23:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 00:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 04:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-03, 08:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 07:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-03, 16:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 16:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-04, 07:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-04, 16:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-06-04, 08:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-06-04, 15:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-06-04, 23:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 17:25

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-06, 19:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-06, 21:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ppilot - 2013-06-06, 21:51

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 21:54

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 22:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:15

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 04:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 08:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-08, 05:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-06-13, 21:52

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-07, 06:41

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 06:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-08, 01:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 01:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 22:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-09, 05:41

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by grimevil - 2013-06-14, 10:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by carmeli - 2013-06-16, 15:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-16, 16:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-16, 17:55

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-16, 18:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rtwolfe - 2013-06-17, 03:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-17, 17:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-17, 18:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-17, 18:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-18, 04:37

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-18, 12:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-06-18, 23:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-19, 01:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-19, 07:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by skcubrats - 2013-06-19, 19:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-20, 07:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-24, 06:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-24, 17:28

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-24, 18:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by zombieagain - 2013-07-01, 22:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-07-02, 03:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-02, 04:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-03, 12:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-06, 05:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-07-06, 17:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-07-06, 19:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-08, 05:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-07-15, 00:51

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-15, 02:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-15, 17:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by avus m3 - 2013-07-17, 02:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 02:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 20:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 21:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-07-23, 19:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 19:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-07-23, 22:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 23:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-24, 05:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-24, 06:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-24, 23:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 22:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by totalhavoc - 2013-07-17, 23:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 23:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-23, 23:22

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-23, 23:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 02:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-26, 03:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-26, 20:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-25, 14:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 16:57

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-07-25, 20:28

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kevinb77 - 2013-07-26, 00:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-26, 15:50

Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-26, 21:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-07-28, 19:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-28, 20:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-05, 18:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ascagnel - 2013-08-05, 20:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-06, 04:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 06:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-06, 18:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 21:02

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-06, 21:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 22:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-06, 09:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 15:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 22:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-07, 00:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-07, 17:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-12, 20:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-08-12, 21:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-12, 21:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-12, 22:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-12, 23:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 19:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 19:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by feerlessleadr - 2013-08-12, 23:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dreamscape86 - 2013-08-13, 02:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-13, 02:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 02:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by doublea - 2013-08-13, 18:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 19:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 21:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 22:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-14, 00:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-14, 07:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 19:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 20:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by opdenkamp - 2013-08-13, 20:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 20:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 21:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-13, 21:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-14, 00:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-14, 08:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-14, 01:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-23, 08:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by apollo753 - 2013-10-27, 19:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-10-27, 23:37

Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help