Why not WMC as backend?
FIBO
Member
Posts: 86
#108
2013-02-21, 15:11
(2013-02-21, 02:23)krustyreturns Wrote:
(2013-02-20, 15:11)FIBO Wrote: Will there be or is there a add-on or script I can install to watch live TV within XBMC without running WMC itself/parallel. Just making use of the same background progamms WMC does?

Yes, I am working on an Add-On to enable recorded tv and live tv using xbmc's recording service and epg. This will not require you to run wmc at the same time as xbmc.
This is why I started to follow this topic
Quote:Distinct from this, this thread has also discussed launchers (or shortcuts) to start parts of wmc for viewing live tv, record tv, etc. These launchers all involve running wmc at the same time as xbmc. These are available now.
And this is where I lost track.

Thanx for clarifying. I think your doing fine work and I'm looking forward to the results
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-04, 17:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 18:19
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 23:02
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jajoflo - 2012-09-05, 02:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 00:17
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by debennett2 - 2013-01-23, 21:22
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 02:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-10-29, 05:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-10-29, 16:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by joebrady - 2012-09-06, 05:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-18, 15:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-23, 17:00
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kreeturez - 2012-09-24, 00:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-24, 00:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-24, 01:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 15:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-26, 16:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 17:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-27, 10:26
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-09-27, 12:45
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-01, 04:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-10-02, 21:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-02, 23:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by DJShadow - 2012-10-12, 19:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ebucha - 2012-10-17, 21:07
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by benoire - 2012-10-22, 08:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Crimzin - 2012-10-24, 23:16
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by T800 - 2012-10-25, 08:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by svet-am - 2012-10-29, 15:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2012-10-17, 21:31
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-10-17, 21:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by sub3 - 2012-10-22, 17:39
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-01-24, 17:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-01-31, 16:10
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-01, 20:42
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 01:03
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 20:28
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 21:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-03, 20:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-03, 23:23
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Hijo del sol - 2013-02-04, 04:21
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 10:21
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 18:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by emveepee - 2013-02-05, 04:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bmn001 - 2013-02-05, 20:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-06, 11:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-08, 20:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 17:50
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-06, 18:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-07, 04:17
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 21:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-08, 15:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-08, 17:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-02-09, 16:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-10, 11:52
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by papreston - 2013-02-10, 15:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2013-02-10, 16:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-10, 16:49
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-11, 06:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-11, 13:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-12, 08:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-12, 14:42
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-12, 10:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-12, 13:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 14:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-02-15, 05:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-15, 05:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 20:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 17:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 21:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-02-20, 00:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-20, 03:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-20, 15:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-20, 20:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-21, 15:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 05:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 20:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 21:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 06:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 10:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-04, 15:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-03-05, 08:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mrkevbo - 2013-03-10, 23:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-03-11, 04:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Tyzing - 2013-03-11, 21:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-12, 10:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-12, 13:36
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 01:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 12:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 03:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 16:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 19:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-15, 01:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 12:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 18:22
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 21:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 21:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-14, 00:42
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-14, 03:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 07:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-09-22, 15:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Angelscry - 2013-09-22, 15:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 21:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-22, 18:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-18, 19:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-19, 00:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 16:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-22, 18:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 01:02
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ConfusedTA - 2013-03-19, 14:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-03-21, 10:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-03-22, 06:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by d3maxt - 2013-03-22, 17:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 09:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-23, 10:09
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 18:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by username145 - 2013-03-24, 00:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-24, 23:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 06:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-25, 09:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-25, 11:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by VladTepz - 2013-03-25, 12:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 19:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-26, 17:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-03-28, 05:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-29, 16:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 19:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-29, 19:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 22:48
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-30, 00:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-30, 21:59
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by moniker - 2013-03-31, 01:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-03-31, 03:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-04-02, 21:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-04, 10:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by justinobwi - 2013-04-04, 18:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Slappa - 2013-04-09, 13:09
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-04-10, 05:59
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-04-15, 16:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MyClosedEyes - 2013-04-17, 05:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by tcs2tx - 2013-04-19, 00:48
Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-24, 13:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-04-24, 20:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-25, 08:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-04-29, 21:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Neebski - 2013-04-30, 18:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-05-06, 03:45
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-06, 07:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-06, 13:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-08, 16:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-08, 16:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 19:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-06, 19:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by micster - 2013-05-06, 21:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-07, 12:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-05-07, 15:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-07, 16:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-05-07, 22:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-09, 19:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-05-08, 23:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 23:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-10, 00:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-14, 02:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-21, 22:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-12, 20:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-13, 08:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rap777 - 2013-05-13, 10:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Bladed - 2013-05-21, 01:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Mankix - 2013-05-22, 17:58
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-22, 19:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-22, 20:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-05-22, 23:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-05-23, 00:18
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 02:31
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 04:59
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 09:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-05-23, 17:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 19:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by locoguano - 2013-05-24, 04:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 17:31
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 19:01
Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-28, 17:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-28, 22:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 23:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 00:04
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-29, 00:03
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 01:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 01:53
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 02:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 04:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 07:03
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-30, 03:18
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-30, 22:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-02, 23:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 00:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 04:17
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 07:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 16:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-04, 07:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-04, 16:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-06-04, 08:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-06-04, 15:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-06-04, 23:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 17:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-06, 21:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ppilot - 2013-06-06, 21:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 21:54
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 22:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:15
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 04:22
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 08:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-06-13, 21:52
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-07, 06:41
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 06:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 01:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 22:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-09, 05:41
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by grimevil - 2013-06-14, 10:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by carmeli - 2013-06-16, 15:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-16, 16:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-16, 17:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rtwolfe - 2013-06-17, 03:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-17, 17:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-17, 18:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-17, 18:30
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-18, 12:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-06-18, 23:23
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by skcubrats - 2013-06-19, 19:23
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-24, 17:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by zombieagain - 2013-07-01, 22:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-02, 04:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-03, 12:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-07-06, 17:31
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-07-15, 00:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-15, 17:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by avus m3 - 2013-07-17, 02:45
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 02:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 20:32
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 21:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-07-23, 19:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 19:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-07-23, 22:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 23:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-24, 05:07
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-24, 06:19
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-24, 23:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 22:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by totalhavoc - 2013-07-17, 23:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 23:10
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-23, 23:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 02:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-26, 03:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-26, 20:07
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-25, 14:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 16:57
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-07-25, 20:28
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kevinb77 - 2013-07-26, 00:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-26, 15:50
Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-26, 21:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-28, 20:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-05, 18:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ascagnel - 2013-08-05, 20:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 06:49
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 21:02
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 22:46
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-06, 09:16
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 15:32
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 22:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-07, 17:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-08-12, 21:18
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dreamscape86 - 2013-08-13, 02:46
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-13, 02:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by doublea - 2013-08-13, 18:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 19:49
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by opdenkamp - 2013-08-13, 20:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 20:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-13, 21:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-14, 08:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-23, 08:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by apollo753 - 2013-10-27, 19:08
Home
Search
Help
Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
Why not WMC as backend?11