Why not WMC as backend?
moniker
Newbie
Posts: 2
#191
2013-03-31, 01:48
Krusty and helpers, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU for your efforts on this project.

I am a live TV watcher and think this is an ideal marriage between the very best live TV client and the very best media client. Right now I have both WMC and XBMC on my Win7 64 HTPC and do not like the tedious process of switching between them. This project is heaven sent. Kudos for your efforts.

My system is all on one HTPC machine with no networking other than the net. I have a couple TB of movies and an HDHomerun turner. This is a simple setup. I am not a programmer or able to write any sort of scripts or code but I am more than willing to test what you have done on my HTPC. You can view me as a noobie and see how well it all works for a noobie.

Let me know if I can be of help and THANK YOU ALL.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-04, 17:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 18:19
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 23:02
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jajoflo - 2012-09-05, 02:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 00:17
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by debennett2 - 2013-01-23, 21:22
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 02:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-10-29, 05:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-10-29, 16:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by joebrady - 2012-09-06, 05:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-18, 15:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-23, 17:00
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kreeturez - 2012-09-24, 00:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-24, 00:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-24, 01:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 15:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-26, 16:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 17:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-27, 10:26
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-09-27, 12:45
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-01, 04:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-10-02, 21:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-02, 23:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by DJShadow - 2012-10-12, 19:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ebucha - 2012-10-17, 21:07
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by benoire - 2012-10-22, 08:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Crimzin - 2012-10-24, 23:16
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by T800 - 2012-10-25, 08:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by svet-am - 2012-10-29, 15:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2012-10-17, 21:31
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-10-17, 21:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by sub3 - 2012-10-22, 17:39
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-01-24, 17:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-01-31, 16:10
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-01, 20:42
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 01:03
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 20:28
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 21:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-03, 20:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-03, 23:23
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Hijo del sol - 2013-02-04, 04:21
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 10:21
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 18:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by emveepee - 2013-02-05, 04:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bmn001 - 2013-02-05, 20:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-06, 11:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-08, 20:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 17:50
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-06, 18:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-07, 04:17
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 21:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-08, 15:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-08, 17:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-02-09, 16:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-10, 11:52
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by papreston - 2013-02-10, 15:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2013-02-10, 16:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-10, 16:49
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-11, 06:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-11, 13:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-12, 08:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-12, 14:42
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-12, 10:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-12, 13:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 14:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-02-15, 05:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-15, 05:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 20:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 17:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 21:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-02-20, 00:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-20, 03:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-20, 15:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-20, 20:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-21, 15:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 05:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 20:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 21:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 06:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 10:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-04, 15:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-03-05, 08:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mrkevbo - 2013-03-10, 23:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-03-11, 04:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Tyzing - 2013-03-11, 21:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-12, 10:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-12, 13:36
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 01:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 12:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 03:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 16:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 19:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-15, 01:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 12:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 18:22
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 21:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 21:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-14, 00:42
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-14, 03:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 07:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-09-22, 15:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Angelscry - 2013-09-22, 15:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 21:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-22, 18:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-18, 19:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-19, 00:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 16:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-22, 18:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 01:02
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ConfusedTA - 2013-03-19, 14:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-03-21, 10:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-03-22, 06:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by d3maxt - 2013-03-22, 17:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 09:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-23, 10:09
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 18:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by username145 - 2013-03-24, 00:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-24, 23:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 06:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-25, 09:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-25, 11:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by VladTepz - 2013-03-25, 12:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 19:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-26, 17:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-03-28, 05:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-29, 16:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 19:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-29, 19:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 22:48
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-30, 00:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-30, 21:59
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by moniker - 2013-03-31, 01:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-03-31, 03:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-04-02, 21:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-04, 10:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by justinobwi - 2013-04-04, 18:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Slappa - 2013-04-09, 13:09
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-04-10, 05:59
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-04-15, 16:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MyClosedEyes - 2013-04-17, 05:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by tcs2tx - 2013-04-19, 00:48
Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-24, 13:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-04-24, 20:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-25, 08:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-04-29, 21:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Neebski - 2013-04-30, 18:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-05-06, 03:45
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-06, 07:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-06, 13:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-08, 16:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-08, 16:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 19:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-06, 19:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by micster - 2013-05-06, 21:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-07, 12:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-05-07, 15:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-07, 16:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-05-07, 22:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-09, 19:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-05-08, 23:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 23:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-10, 00:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-14, 02:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-21, 22:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-12, 20:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-13, 08:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rap777 - 2013-05-13, 10:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Bladed - 2013-05-21, 01:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Mankix - 2013-05-22, 17:58
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-22, 19:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-22, 20:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-05-22, 23:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-05-23, 00:18
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 02:31
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 04:59
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 09:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-05-23, 17:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 19:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by locoguano - 2013-05-24, 04:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 17:31
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 19:01
Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-28, 17:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-28, 22:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 23:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 00:04
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-29, 00:03
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 01:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 01:53
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 02:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 04:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 07:03
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-30, 03:18
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-30, 22:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-02, 23:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 00:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 04:17
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 07:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 16:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-04, 07:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-04, 16:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-06-04, 08:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-06-04, 15:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-06-04, 23:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 17:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-06, 21:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ppilot - 2013-06-06, 21:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 21:54
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 22:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:15
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 04:22
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 08:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-06-13, 21:52
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-07, 06:41
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 06:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 01:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 22:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-09, 05:41
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by grimevil - 2013-06-14, 10:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by carmeli - 2013-06-16, 15:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-16, 16:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-16, 17:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rtwolfe - 2013-06-17, 03:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-17, 17:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-17, 18:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-17, 18:30
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-18, 12:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-06-18, 23:23
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by skcubrats - 2013-06-19, 19:23
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-24, 17:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by zombieagain - 2013-07-01, 22:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-02, 04:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-03, 12:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-07-06, 17:31
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-07-15, 00:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-15, 17:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by avus m3 - 2013-07-17, 02:45
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 02:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 20:32
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 21:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-07-23, 19:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 19:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-07-23, 22:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 23:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-24, 05:07
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-24, 06:19
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-24, 23:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 22:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by totalhavoc - 2013-07-17, 23:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 23:10
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-23, 23:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 02:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-26, 03:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-26, 20:07
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-25, 14:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 16:57
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-07-25, 20:28
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kevinb77 - 2013-07-26, 00:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-26, 15:50
Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-26, 21:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-28, 20:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-05, 18:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ascagnel - 2013-08-05, 20:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 06:49
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 21:02
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 22:46
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-06, 09:16
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 15:32
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 22:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-07, 17:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-08-12, 21:18
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dreamscape86 - 2013-08-13, 02:46
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-13, 02:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by doublea - 2013-08-13, 18:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 19:49
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by opdenkamp - 2013-08-13, 20:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 20:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-13, 21:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-14, 08:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-23, 08:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by apollo753 - 2013-10-27, 19:08
Home
Search
Help
Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
Why not WMC as backend?11