Why not WMC as backend?
Sojhinn
Junior Member
Posts: 17
#308
2013-06-08, 22:08
Krusty I'm curious is the buffer encrypted as well? So that way we have access to the copy once channels.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-04, 17:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 18:19
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 23:02
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jajoflo - 2012-09-05, 02:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 00:17
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by debennett2 - 2013-01-23, 21:22
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 02:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-10-29, 05:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-10-29, 16:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by joebrady - 2012-09-06, 05:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-18, 15:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-23, 17:00
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kreeturez - 2012-09-24, 00:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-24, 00:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-24, 01:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 15:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-26, 16:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 17:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-27, 10:26
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-09-27, 12:45
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-01, 04:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-10-02, 21:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-02, 23:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by DJShadow - 2012-10-12, 19:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ebucha - 2012-10-17, 21:07
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by benoire - 2012-10-22, 08:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Crimzin - 2012-10-24, 23:16
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by T800 - 2012-10-25, 08:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by svet-am - 2012-10-29, 15:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2012-10-17, 21:31
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-10-17, 21:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by sub3 - 2012-10-22, 17:39
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-01-24, 17:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-01-31, 16:10
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-01, 20:42
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 01:03
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 20:28
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 21:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-03, 20:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-03, 23:23
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Hijo del sol - 2013-02-04, 04:21
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 10:21
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 18:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by emveepee - 2013-02-05, 04:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bmn001 - 2013-02-05, 20:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-06, 11:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-08, 20:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 17:50
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-06, 18:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-07, 04:17
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 21:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-08, 15:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-08, 17:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-02-09, 16:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-10, 11:52
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by papreston - 2013-02-10, 15:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2013-02-10, 16:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-10, 16:49
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-11, 06:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-11, 13:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-12, 08:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-12, 14:42
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-12, 10:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-12, 13:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 14:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-02-15, 05:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-15, 05:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 20:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 17:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 21:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-02-20, 00:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-20, 03:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-20, 15:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-20, 20:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-21, 15:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 05:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 20:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 21:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 06:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 10:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-04, 15:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-03-05, 08:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mrkevbo - 2013-03-10, 23:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-03-11, 04:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Tyzing - 2013-03-11, 21:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-12, 10:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-12, 13:36
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 01:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 12:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 03:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 16:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 19:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-15, 01:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 12:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 18:22
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 21:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 21:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-14, 00:42
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-14, 03:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 07:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-09-22, 15:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Angelscry - 2013-09-22, 15:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 21:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-22, 18:40
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-18, 19:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-19, 00:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 16:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-22, 18:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 01:02
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ConfusedTA - 2013-03-19, 14:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-03-21, 10:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-03-22, 06:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by d3maxt - 2013-03-22, 17:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 09:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-23, 10:09
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 18:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by username145 - 2013-03-24, 00:52
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-24, 23:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 06:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-25, 09:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-25, 11:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by VladTepz - 2013-03-25, 12:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 19:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-26, 17:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-03-28, 05:29
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-29, 16:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 19:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-29, 19:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 22:48
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-30, 00:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-30, 21:59
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by moniker - 2013-03-31, 01:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-03-31, 03:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-04-02, 21:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-04, 10:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by justinobwi - 2013-04-04, 18:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Slappa - 2013-04-09, 13:09
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-04-10, 05:59
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-04-15, 16:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MyClosedEyes - 2013-04-17, 05:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by tcs2tx - 2013-04-19, 00:48
Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-24, 13:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-04-24, 20:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-25, 08:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-04-29, 21:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Neebski - 2013-04-30, 18:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-05-06, 03:45
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-06, 07:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-06, 13:12
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-08, 16:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-08, 16:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 19:30
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-06, 19:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by micster - 2013-05-06, 21:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-07, 12:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-05-07, 15:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-07, 16:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-05-07, 22:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-09, 19:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-05-08, 23:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 23:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-10, 00:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-14, 02:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-21, 22:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-12, 20:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-13, 08:20
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rap777 - 2013-05-13, 10:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Bladed - 2013-05-21, 01:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Mankix - 2013-05-22, 17:58
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-22, 19:14
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-22, 20:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-05-22, 23:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-05-23, 00:18
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 02:31
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 04:59
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 09:01
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-05-23, 17:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 19:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by locoguano - 2013-05-24, 04:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 17:31
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 19:01
Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-28, 17:34
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-28, 22:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 23:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:54
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 00:04
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-29, 00:03
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 01:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 01:53
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 02:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 04:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 07:03
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-30, 03:18
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-30, 22:56
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-02, 23:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 00:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 04:17
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 07:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 16:37
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-04, 07:35
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-04, 16:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-06-04, 08:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-06-04, 15:36
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-06-04, 23:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 17:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-06, 21:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ppilot - 2013-06-06, 21:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 21:54
Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:03
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 22:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:15
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 04:22
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 08:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-06-13, 21:52
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-07, 06:41
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 06:53
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 01:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 22:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-09, 05:41
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by grimevil - 2013-06-14, 10:26
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by carmeli - 2013-06-16, 15:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-16, 16:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-16, 17:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rtwolfe - 2013-06-17, 03:13
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-17, 17:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-17, 18:06
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-17, 18:30
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-18, 12:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-06-18, 23:23
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by skcubrats - 2013-06-19, 19:23
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-24, 17:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by zombieagain - 2013-07-01, 22:43
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-02, 04:25
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-03, 12:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-07-06, 17:31
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-07-15, 00:51
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-15, 17:10
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by avus m3 - 2013-07-17, 02:45
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 02:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 20:32
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 21:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-07-23, 19:44
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 19:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-07-23, 22:58
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 23:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-24, 05:07
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-24, 06:19
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-24, 23:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 22:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by totalhavoc - 2013-07-17, 23:04
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 23:10
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-23, 23:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 02:11
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-26, 03:15
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-26, 20:07
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-25, 14:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 16:57
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-07-25, 20:28
Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kevinb77 - 2013-07-26, 00:28
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-26, 15:50
Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-26, 21:08
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-28, 20:38
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-05, 18:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ascagnel - 2013-08-05, 20:27
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 06:49
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 21:02
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 22:46
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-06, 09:16
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 15:32
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 22:55
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-07, 17:05
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-08-12, 21:18
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dreamscape86 - 2013-08-13, 02:46
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-13, 02:48
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by doublea - 2013-08-13, 18:24
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 19:49
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by opdenkamp - 2013-08-13, 20:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 20:50
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-13, 21:57
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-14, 08:33
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-23, 08:47
RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by apollo753 - 2013-10-27, 19:08
Home
Search
Help
Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
Why not WMC as backend?11