Why not WMC as backend?

Why not WMC as backend?

bry
Team-Kodi Member

Posts: 3,641
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 57

bry
Team-Kodi Member
Posts: 3,641

#321

2013-06-18, 12:11

(2013-06-18, 04:37)krustyreturns Wrote: Some of the requests are taken, I just PM them with the info. Like Jeff says, its clear what needs to be done. Once the bigger known issues are resolved, we'll just release it and let everybody give it a try.

Good to know. Keep up the good work guys!

Find

Messages In This Thread

Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-04, 17:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 18:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-04, 18:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by margro - 2012-09-04, 23:02

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-05, 00:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jajoflo - 2012-09-05, 02:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-05, 04:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 00:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-06, 01:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by debennett2 - 2013-01-23, 21:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-01-24, 06:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-09-06, 02:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-10-29, 05:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-10-29, 16:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-06, 04:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by joebrady - 2012-09-06, 05:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-18, 15:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-21, 01:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-23, 17:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-23, 18:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kreeturez - 2012-09-24, 00:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Jamesy - 2012-09-24, 00:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2012-09-24, 01:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-24, 01:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 15:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bluray - 2012-09-26, 16:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-26, 17:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Haudrauf - 2012-09-27, 10:26

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-09-27, 12:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-01, 04:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2012-10-02, 21:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kristjin - 2012-10-02, 23:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by DJShadow - 2012-10-12, 19:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ebucha - 2012-10-17, 21:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by benoire - 2012-10-22, 08:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Crimzin - 2012-10-24, 23:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by T800 - 2012-10-25, 08:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by svet-am - 2012-10-29, 15:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2012-10-17, 21:31

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2012-10-17, 21:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by sub3 - 2012-10-22, 17:39

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-01-24, 17:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-01-24, 19:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-01-31, 16:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-01, 20:35

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-01, 20:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-01, 22:14

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 01:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-02, 19:56

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 20:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-02, 21:08

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-02, 21:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-02, 22:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-03, 20:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-03, 22:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-03, 23:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-03, 23:39

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Hijo del sol - 2013-02-04, 04:21

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 10:21

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-04, 17:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-04, 18:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-04, 18:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jrichards52081 - 2013-02-05, 04:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-05, 05:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by emveepee - 2013-02-05, 04:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bmn001 - 2013-02-05, 20:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-06, 11:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-06, 18:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-08, 20:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 17:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-06, 18:41

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-02-06, 18:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-06, 19:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-07, 04:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by 2twisty - 2013-02-06, 21:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-08, 15:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-08, 17:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-08, 20:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-02-09, 16:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-09, 19:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-10, 11:52

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by papreston - 2013-02-10, 15:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Malosar - 2013-02-10, 16:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-10, 16:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-11, 05:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-11, 06:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jrichards52081 - 2013-02-12, 01:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-12, 02:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-11, 13:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-12, 04:09

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dbezerra - 2013-02-12, 08:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-12, 14:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-02-12, 10:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by royfra - 2013-02-12, 13:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-13, 05:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 14:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-14, 17:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bernr - 2013-02-15, 05:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-15, 05:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by thewarm - 2013-02-14, 20:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-14, 21:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 17:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-16, 19:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-16, 21:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-02-20, 00:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-02-20, 03:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-20, 15:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-02-20, 20:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-02-21, 02:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by FIBO - 2013-02-21, 15:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-03, 05:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 05:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-03, 05:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 20:51

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-12, 21:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by wsume99 - 2013-03-12, 21:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 06:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-03, 08:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-03, 10:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-04, 15:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-03-05, 08:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mrkevbo - 2013-03-10, 23:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-11, 02:39

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Scott R - 2013-03-11, 04:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-11, 17:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Tyzing - 2013-03-11, 21:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-12, 10:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-12, 13:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-12, 19:43

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 01:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-13, 03:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 12:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 03:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-13, 04:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 16:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-13, 17:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 19:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-15, 01:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-15, 23:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 12:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-13, 18:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-14, 17:24

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-13, 21:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-13, 21:51

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-03-14, 00:42

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-14, 03:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-03-15, 04:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-15, 04:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-03-15, 05:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-15, 16:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 07:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-09-22, 15:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Angelscry - 2013-09-22, 15:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-09-22, 21:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-22, 18:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-18, 19:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-19, 00:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-19, 00:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-19, 16:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 16:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-03-22, 18:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-19, 01:02

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ConfusedTA - 2013-03-19, 14:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by deletedpenguin - 2013-03-19, 21:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-22, 14:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-03-21, 10:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-03-22, 06:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by d3maxt - 2013-03-22, 17:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by deletedpenguin - 2013-03-23, 02:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 09:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-23, 10:09

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-23, 17:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by stven - 2013-03-23, 18:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-23, 18:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by username145 - 2013-03-24, 00:52

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-24, 04:39

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-24, 23:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-25, 05:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 06:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-25, 16:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by smacrae - 2013-03-25, 09:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-25, 11:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by VladTepz - 2013-03-25, 12:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-25, 19:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-03-25, 22:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-26, 17:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-26, 17:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-03-28, 05:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by spyder - 2013-03-29, 16:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 19:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Riztnack - 2013-03-29, 19:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-29, 22:48

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-03-30, 00:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-30, 18:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-03-30, 00:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-03-30, 21:59

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by deletedpenguin - 2013-03-30, 11:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by moniker - 2013-03-31, 01:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-03-31, 03:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-04-02, 21:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-04, 10:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by justinobwi - 2013-04-04, 18:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-05, 01:40

Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by tekno - 2013-04-09, 07:56

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-09, 17:26

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-04-09, 17:49

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by rtwolfe - 2013-04-10, 04:34

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-10, 16:36

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-04-10, 21:55

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by staknhalo - 2013-04-11, 06:48

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-04-11, 17:01

RE: Does this mean there is hope for WMC PVR backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-04-12, 17:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Slappa - 2013-04-09, 13:09

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-04-10, 05:59

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-04-10, 23:41

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-04-15, 16:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MyClosedEyes - 2013-04-17, 05:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by tcs2tx - 2013-04-19, 00:48

Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-24, 13:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-24, 16:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-04-24, 20:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-04-25, 08:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-04-29, 21:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Neebski - 2013-04-30, 18:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-04-30, 19:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by whiteyw80 - 2013-05-06, 03:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-06, 07:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-06, 13:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-05-06, 16:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-08, 16:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-08, 16:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 19:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-06, 19:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by micster - 2013-05-06, 21:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-07, 12:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dennis5056 - 2013-05-07, 15:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-07, 16:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-05-07, 22:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-05-08, 20:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-09, 19:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-05-08, 23:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-08, 23:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-10, 00:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-05-14, 02:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-21, 22:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-12, 20:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-05-13, 07:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by runee - 2013-05-13, 08:20

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rap777 - 2013-05-13, 10:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Bladed - 2013-05-21, 01:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Mankix - 2013-05-22, 17:58

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-22, 19:14

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-22, 20:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Powerhouse - 2013-05-22, 23:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-05-23, 00:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 00:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 02:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 04:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 04:59

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 06:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 09:01

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 09:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-05-23, 17:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-23, 19:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-23, 21:12

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by locoguano - 2013-05-24, 04:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 17:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 19:01

Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-05-28, 17:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-28, 19:34

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-28, 22:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-28, 23:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-28, 23:54

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 00:04

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-05-29, 00:03

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 01:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-05-29, 01:53

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-29, 02:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 04:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-29, 05:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-29, 07:03

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-05-29, 07:30

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Cab121 - 2013-05-30, 03:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-05-30, 22:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-02, 23:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 00:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 04:17

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-03, 08:29

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-03, 07:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-03, 16:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-03, 16:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-04, 07:35

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-04, 16:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-06-04, 08:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-06-04, 15:36

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jdmagoo - 2013-06-04, 23:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 17:25

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-06, 19:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-06, 21:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ppilot - 2013-06-06, 21:51

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 21:54

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-06, 22:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:15

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-06, 22:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 04:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 04:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-07, 08:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-08, 05:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rykr - 2013-06-13, 21:52

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-06-07, 06:41

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-07, 06:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-08, 01:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 01:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Sojhinn - 2013-06-08, 22:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-09, 05:41

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by grimevil - 2013-06-14, 10:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by carmeli - 2013-06-16, 15:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-16, 16:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-16, 17:55

Re: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-16, 18:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rtwolfe - 2013-06-17, 03:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by rushingjs - 2013-06-17, 17:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-17, 18:06

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-17, 18:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-18, 04:37

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-06-18, 12:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-06-18, 23:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-06-19, 01:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-19, 07:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by skcubrats - 2013-06-19, 19:23

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-20, 07:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-24, 06:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JeffreyF - 2013-06-24, 17:28

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-06-24, 18:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by zombieagain - 2013-07-01, 22:43

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-07-02, 03:53

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-02, 04:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-03, 12:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-06, 05:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-07-06, 17:31

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-07-06, 19:30

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-08, 05:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Evoxer - 2013-07-15, 00:51

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-15, 02:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-15, 17:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by avus m3 - 2013-07-17, 02:45

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 02:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 20:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-17, 21:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Dark_Slayer - 2013-07-23, 19:44

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 19:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by scott967 - 2013-07-23, 22:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-23, 23:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-24, 05:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-24, 06:19

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-24, 23:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 22:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by totalhavoc - 2013-07-17, 23:04

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-17, 23:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-07-23, 23:22

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-07-23, 23:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 02:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by LSU Jonno - 2013-07-26, 03:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-07-26, 20:07

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by TRiddle - 2013-07-25, 14:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by hyde01 - 2013-07-25, 16:57

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by Livin - 2013-07-25, 20:28

Re: RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by kevinb77 - 2013-07-26, 00:28

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-26, 15:50

Why not WMC as backend? - by TjaLfE - 2013-07-26, 21:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-07-28, 19:00

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-07-28, 20:38

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-05, 18:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by ascagnel - 2013-08-05, 20:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-06, 04:40

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 06:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-06, 18:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 21:02

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-06, 21:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-06, 22:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-06, 09:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 15:32

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by w84no1 - 2013-08-06, 22:55

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-07, 00:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-08-07, 17:05

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-12, 20:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by jeffj9930 - 2013-08-12, 21:18

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-12, 21:25

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-12, 22:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-12, 23:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 19:03

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 19:10

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by feerlessleadr - 2013-08-12, 23:13

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by dreamscape86 - 2013-08-13, 02:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:22

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by mikey976 - 2013-08-13, 02:48

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 02:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by doublea - 2013-08-13, 18:24

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:37

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 18:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 19:26

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 21:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-13, 22:56

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-14, 00:46

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by JuggalotusHeat - 2013-08-14, 07:11

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 19:49

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 20:16

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by opdenkamp - 2013-08-13, 20:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by bry - 2013-08-13, 20:50

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-13, 21:27

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-13, 21:57

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-14, 00:58

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by asm495 - 2013-08-14, 08:33

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-08-14, 01:15

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by MeMeMe - 2013-09-23, 08:47

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by apollo753 - 2013-10-27, 19:08

RE: Why not WMC as backend? - by krustyreturns - 2013-10-27, 23:37