2012-10-26, 04:45
Thanks, I was waiting for timeshifting to try NextPVR
(2012-10-26, 18:49)wileecoyote Wrote: I went waaaaay out on a limb here... and built a ForTheRecord build with Red_F's submitted changes, which have not yet been approved/merged into the opdenkamp repository. I built this because I know there are a lot of FTR users out there waiting to play with a new FTR build.
Please be advised, these builds are experimental and have NOT been tested by me, so please let me know if they do not work and I will remove them from the binaries page.
(2012-10-26, 18:49)wileecoyote Wrote: I went waaaaay out on a limb here... and built a ForTheRecord build with Red_F's submitted changes, which have not yet been approved/merged into the opdenkamp repository. I built this because I know there are a lot of FTR users out there waiting to play with a new FTR build.
Please be advised, these builds are experimental and have NOT been tested by me, so please let me know if they do not work and I will remove them from the binaries page.
(2012-10-26, 21:04)x-cimo Wrote: Thanks a lot for this. RedF is pretty furious at comiting stuff right now, I see commits every hours or so You might have an issue to keep up lol
(2012-10-26, 21:37)x-cimo Wrote: Do you guys have an opinion between nextPVR and FTR, I'm trying to figure out which one to pick.
(2012-10-26, 21:48)loggio Wrote: Last time I used next pvr, channel changes were slow as, and it was pretty buggy...Its still fairly early days for NextPVR's XBMC addon, so I definitely wouldn't claim its perfect. I'm happy to look at problems people encounter though - just post (over at http://forums.gbpvr.com/forumdisplay.php?54-XBMC) a description of the problem, along with the logs, and I'll check it out.
Quote:I haven't seen many commits on git from sub3 since then so I'm assuming its still slow and buggy.I've just commited a pile of changes yesterday. I'd been holding off submitting some stuff while trying to coordinate other changes made on the backend, and also while the nextpvr addon was being merged into the XBMC mainline.
(2012-10-27, 00:03)sub3 Wrote:(2012-10-26, 21:48)loggio Wrote: Last time I used next pvr, channel changes were slow as, and it was pretty buggy...Its still fairly early days for NextPVR's XBMC addon, so I definitely wouldn't claim its perfect. I'm happy to look at problems people encounter though - just post (over at http://forums.gbpvr.com/forumdisplay.php?54-XBMC) a description of the problem, along with the logs, and I'll check it out.
Quote:I haven't seen many commits on git from sub3 since then so I'm assuming its still slow and buggy.I've just commited a pile of changes yesterday. I'd been holding off submitting some stuff while trying to coordinate other changes made on the backend, and also while the nextpvr addon was being merged into the XBMC mainline.