XBMC Foundation documentation
#10
Is that all you can reply to? I'm giving you a chance to express how you feel we can be more transparent, since your accusations are based on assumptions. I'm trying to keep things calm and civil. You try to personally attack us using anything you can grab at, why? Why not focus on the issues and try to make them better? Pushing people's buttons is what gets you in trouble, not your viewpoint on the GPL, FLOSS, or the Team/Foundation's transparency. This thread is what you've tried to get before, a frank discussion on these issues, so let's discuss these issues.

So again I ask, is there anything else (from my previous post) that I'm forgetting that would be good to publish to the public?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
XBMC Foundation documentation - by Robotica - 2012-10-12, 18:18
RE: XBMC Foundation documentation - by Ned Scott - 2012-10-16, 21:38
RE: XBMC Foundation documentation - by amet - 2012-10-19, 12:52
RE: XBMC Foundation documentation - by amet - 2013-10-16, 20:46
RE: XBMC Foundation documentation - by Kib - 2013-10-25, 11:06
RE: XBMC Foundation documentation - by amet - 2013-10-16, 21:13
RE: XBMC Foundation documentation - by amet - 2013-10-25, 12:44
Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
XBMC Foundation documentation0