2013-02-15, 17:20
(2013-02-15, 17:12)mcborzu Wrote:(2013-02-15, 16:35)Big_Noid Wrote: I dont care too much for a beta/wip repo. Users who want that sort of stuff already know their way to the forum. It will only open up the way for users who dont know what they are doing to easily download and install stuff that can break overnight.
Allowing skins without PVR is a big +1 from my side. If I ever make a new skin I couldn't be bothered with adding PVR, I wont use it and never will and I think there are many users out there who feel the same.
Both Ronie and Martijn have said PVR is not a requirement, recommended but not a requirement. Even when I submitted my skin a week ago Ronie confirmed that...
I'm in same boat, PVR being a requirement would definably turn me away...
well problem is that there's no warning system yet that PVR is missing. This was brought up at our last meeting however it was too short to implement.
A big fat warning on the information page and making sure no bad things happen if PVR part is missing would indeed suffice imo.
Best would be to leave out any menu mentioning PVR.
@ronie
So can we officially claim PVR is optional if some requirements are met like it's clearly stated that it's not included?
I mean how could we make PVR a requirement while our "official" Touched skin by Jezz_X hasn't got PVR (no offence meant Jezz_X because we know what job it is to add it).