2014-03-28, 23:06
Sure. I'm just attempting to clarify how we got to where we are now. Not slate anyone or start a flame-war.
(2014-03-28, 22:52)gibxxi Wrote: "A Few Users"? Define A Few? I've not been following the Beta thread all that closely, but I can't help thinking downgrading NFS for the sake of "A Few Users" is a bit of a knee-jerk reaction. Is it even confirmed that those users issues were directly caused by the newer libNFS library?
(2014-03-29, 02:36)garretn Wrote: @bossanova808, calm down buddy. Nobody was trying or intending to belittle the library issue, and I *never* said the artwork issue was in Beta1 (Because Beta1 uses 1.6).
Like you said, it doesn't matter. The reason I'm not interested in fixing 1.3 is because that's fixing a fix, it's far more ideal to fix the original problem instead and get all platforms on the same libnfs version again.
Now, lets move on. I'm still working on this, and I'm starting to think that the duplicates problem mentioned may actually be related but at this point is still a suspicion since I'm having a little trouble getting libnfs to compile (so I can add some debugging et ceteras). I suspect the attributes used to identify and compare files is a potential culprit, resulting in duplicates -- and also what would appear to be a missing file to the cleaning functions since those don't actually use the file location alone, but also hashes.
(2014-03-29, 02:36)garretn Wrote: I'm having a little trouble getting libnfs to compile