2014-06-09, 00:24
I was thinking running a 6th database with joint capabilities with user 1 and 2.
I was considering a trigger aswel.
It could go 2 ways though.
Database 6 could update playcount1 and playcount2 via a trigger when database 6 watches something.
But what about if user 2 watches something by themselves. Should it not also be displayed with a tick on database 6 so that you know at least one of you have watched it.
This could be handy for multiple users trying to pick a movie together.
I.E me and my housemates could have all 5 databases linked to database 6.
When we go to watch a movie we can hide watched and it will hide everything each of us have seen. So there wont be anymore asking has anyone seen this.
It could be setup in 2 different ways. The couple script that uses database 1 and 2 and the family script that uses database 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
Im still considering on what the most efficient way to do that is. But when i do implement this feature it will be like that.
Actually come to think about it, it could be done with 2 triggers, one for each way.
Also i would make database 6 the couples database and database 7 the family database.
When installing the clients you can choose to install both, one or neither just by leaving them un-named.
Im starting to think that my simple script could change the way a lot of people use XBMC.
I was considering a trigger aswel.
It could go 2 ways though.
Database 6 could update playcount1 and playcount2 via a trigger when database 6 watches something.
But what about if user 2 watches something by themselves. Should it not also be displayed with a tick on database 6 so that you know at least one of you have watched it.
This could be handy for multiple users trying to pick a movie together.
I.E me and my housemates could have all 5 databases linked to database 6.
When we go to watch a movie we can hide watched and it will hide everything each of us have seen. So there wont be anymore asking has anyone seen this.
It could be setup in 2 different ways. The couple script that uses database 1 and 2 and the family script that uses database 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
Im still considering on what the most efficient way to do that is. But when i do implement this feature it will be like that.
Actually come to think about it, it could be done with 2 triggers, one for each way.
Also i would make database 6 the couples database and database 7 the family database.
When installing the clients you can choose to install both, one or neither just by leaving them un-named.
Im starting to think that my simple script could change the way a lot of people use XBMC.