[Skank]

My answer is that anything I suggest as an alternative will be up for debate about "hassle". I would argue that a Windows or Linux alternative with external players could be done with less of what I consider "hassle". I would argue that dealing with external players or special builds on a Q5 is not better than doing so on x86 platforms. I would even argue that some people would be better off and feel it is less of a hassle to use two physically different devices and use media stubs (wiki) in Kodi. At least that would have long term support and could be counted on, rather than this absurd wrapper solution. How is that any better than some of the x86 external player options out there? You will never have the full Kodi feature set, period.

You guys love a hacky solution, great, good for you. It's good to know how far people will bend over backwards for certain 3D video file formats.

Using Windows and external player to play Bluray 3D is more a hassle the using and Android Media box.
More of us in this thread had HTPC,before converting to the Android box.

If Kodi and windows or standalone was working properly with Bluray 3D, i don't think most of us will be here trying to look for (cheap made Android box) other alternative than windows.

I will like to have one box that does it all,but so far there's none.

+1