2016-09-16, 08:35
Thanks wesk05.
Am I thus right that we can we summarize it as: 1920x540 or 1280x720 in "60Hz progressive equivalent"?
But I also understand that the core of the issue is that the set-top installed base is antiquated and do not support modern codecs, which would allow more pixels/Mbps. Which supports the" interlaced must die" opinion
Am I thus right that we can we summarize it as: 1920x540 or 1280x720 in "60Hz progressive equivalent"?
But I also understand that the core of the issue is that the set-top installed base is antiquated and do not support modern codecs, which would allow more pixels/Mbps. Which supports the" interlaced must die" opinion
