fArGo Wrote:I have never setup the as you have but is sounds slow for being streaming. Maybe lowering the cash size in xbmc will help you out...?
No bottleneck in the network? Are you using fixed IP, do that? Have you tried to tweak the your MythTV backend?
Just to be clear on streaming over a network. I'm using MythTV's frontend and backend for about a year now, recently also using xbmc and i've never experienced that xbmc over a old 100mb network was slower than using mythtv's client on the same system.
However a well known "problem" with Mythtv is that its channel switching time is a little slow. Out of the box most people have a switching time between 3 - 7 seconds depending on their hardware.
After following a few suggestions from the Mythtv wiki and their mailinglists i've got it between 2-3 seconds on a old 2600 mhz pentium pc with 512 mhz. This does not sound like a lot of time, but it is! After reading al relevant developer discussions and patching code for myself I don't thinks it will get any faster without a minor redesign of that part of the code (read: to much work for a free weekend).
Quote: I whish XBMC change their philosophy aiming to be a client rather than a full fetched HTPC application with native support for TV cards, just like Mediaportal. By the way have you tried Mediaportal? If so please let me know what your experience is.
I believe xbmc's decision is a very profesional one. You must understand that this decision makes it possible to buy a pc, and put a backend on it for the television part and a frontend (e.g. XBMC ofcourse) for doing all the cool stuff and controlling the backend to schedule a recording, watch live tv, etc. All this on one pc!
The good thing about this is that xbmc gets livetv functionality without investing huge amounts of development ours, stays platform independ and has the option to build their own backend later when they feel like it.