2016-10-21, 09:01
Again, especially considering this...
I still don't see a reason not to offer both (new and old) versions as long as it is not figured out how to automatically select the right one depending on the type.
(2016-10-10, 14:20)jd17 Wrote: The original design (especially with the very nice slim bar right to the currently selected cover for rating, year and watched/unwatched) is utterly brilliant....it's at least 2 steps back visually in my opinion. It feels like 100 steps unfortunately.
The change looks like there is a bug in the software. Sorry if that sounds harsh.
I still don't see a reason not to offer both (new and old) versions as long as it is not figured out how to automatically select the right one depending on the type.