2019-03-26, 00:05
proliferation can be good yes but its been bad for KODI IMHO
(2019-03-26, 12:30)mclingo Wrote: indeed, coming across as rude, or even ungrateful is the last thing I want to do.
(2019-03-25, 12:32)mclingo Wrote: we all hate using KODI with external players.
(2019-03-28, 00:20)da3dsoul Wrote: That's a pretty brazen confession. badump tsss. External players, aside from being hideous when they switch view modes, steal focus, don't follow your skin design, and other annoying cosmetic reasons, almost never support gamepad controls, and if you are lucky, then the mapping is usually not the same as the rest of Kodi. You don't get watched state handling or anything else. Kodi may work on a desktop or heaven forbid a laptop, but it's a ten foot interface, and it was intended to be gamepad or remote controlled since its conception.Yeah, in fact... let's not turn this into a debate about personal preferences. If you check my registration date you can believe me when I say that I "campaigned" back then to allow for external players. But external players are an option. And for all the reasons stated above they have limits. If one is happy with external players, I'm happy for him/her. But I don't think it's unreasonable to wish for VideoPlayer to get as good as it can.
(2019-03-28, 13:53)ashlar Wrote:(2019-03-28, 00:20)da3dsoul Wrote: That's a pretty brazen confession. badump tsss. External players, aside from being hideous when they switch view modes, steal focus, don't follow your skin design, and other annoying cosmetic reasons, almost never support gamepad controls, and if you are lucky, then the mapping is usually not the same as the rest of Kodi. You don't get watched state handling or anything else. Kodi may work on a desktop or heaven forbid a laptop, but it's a ten foot interface, and it was intended to be gamepad or remote controlled since its conception.Yeah, in fact... let's not turn this into a debate about personal preferences. If you check my registration date you can believe me when I say that I "campaigned" back then to allow for external players. But external players are an option. And for all the reasons stated above they have limits. If one is happy with external players, I'm happy for him/her. But I don't think it's unreasonable to wish for VideoPlayer to get as good as it can.
(2019-03-28, 00:20)da3dsoul Wrote: That's a pretty brazen confession. badump tsss. External players, aside from being hideous when they switch view modes, steal focus, don't follow your skin design, and other annoying cosmetic reasons, almost never support gamepad controls, and if you are lucky, then the mapping is usually not the same as the rest of Kodi. You don't get watched state handling or anything else. Kodi may work on a desktop or heaven forbid a laptop, but it's a ten foot interface, and it was intended to be gamepad or remote controlled since its conception.hideous when they switch view modes - Huh?
(2019-03-28, 18:27)brazen1 Wrote: Call me crazy but I just don't see the closed source software madVR ever integrating with the open sourced official Kodi. You have been flat out told not a chance in hell. I also don't anticipate anyone in their right mind upgrading the deteriorating forked DSPlayer v17.6 to v18 and beyond let alone creating something similar and maintaining it. We're already on 18.2 approaching v.19. If you think you can bribe someone to create a plug-in and maintain that too, I wish you the best of luck. I really do. In the mean time, I thought it appropriate to suggest external player(s) are not "hated" by "all" and can produce what DSPlayer did and more, aside from some of your arguments against it/them. Maybe you could try embracing one or more external players and your main problem(s) will be solved. Mine are.