2024-04-11, 14:54
Honestly, as with every open source project, we cannot guarantee anything. Currently nobody is working on improvements of this feature. This situation could last forever or change soon. Nobody knows.
(2024-04-09, 23:20)vonson Wrote: - Movies that are assigned as versions to another movie now again will in folder view be displayed as folders that are not added to the library. When manually browsing files this might tempt to add such a movie folder to the library. This might be due to the design of the feature but it still seems strange to me.Can you explain a bit more?
(2024-04-09, 23:20)vonson Wrote: - Opening the version selection dialog is significantly slow.Yes I noticed the same with remote db. Submitted a fix for review.
(2024-04-12, 18:16)CrystalP Wrote:(2024-04-09, 23:20)vonson Wrote: - Movies that are assigned as versions to another movie now again will in folder view be displayed as folders that are not added to the library. When manually browsing files this might tempt to add such a movie folder to the library. This might be due to the design of the feature but it still seems strange to me.Can you explain a bit more?
CrystalP Wrote:- Opening the version selection dialog is significantly slow.
Yes I noticed the same with remote db. Submitted a fix for review.
https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/24977
(2024-04-09, 23:20)vonson Wrote: Now I cannot rely on a folder icon any more. BTW - what happens if I scan a movie file that is already added as a version? I guess I have to check that...That's where I was going.
(2024-04-13, 15:59)vonson Wrote: I'm not into the technical details, but i guess that would mean changing the whole system over, probably to something similar to the movie-set approach. Since ksooo said nobody is currently working on that feature I don't think this will be happening (at least any time soon...).
(2024-04-09, 23:20)vonson Wrote: Now I cannot rely on a folder icon any more. BTW - what happens if I scan a movie file that is already added as a version? I guess I have to check that...
(2024-04-09, 23:20)vonson Wrote: It's obviously a consequence of the design of the feature. As Karellen pointed out - the child versions are no longer in the database, so obviously when brosing the folders they show up as unscanned. Just something I will have to deal with.
(2024-04-09, 23:20)vonson Wrote: When adding new movies to Kodi, instead of auto-scanning the source folder for new content, I usually browse it manually and 'add-to-library' the new titles, which are fairly obvious as they show up with a folder icon, while titles that are already added to the library show just a little square dot.
(2024-04-13, 14:24)vonson Wrote: When adding new movies to Kodi, instead of auto-scanning the source folder for new content, I usually browse it manually and 'add-to-library' the new titles, which are fairly obvious as they show up with a folder icon, while titles that are already added to the library show just a little square dot.You can sort by date to make adding new movies even easier as they'll always be at the front of the list.
Now I cannot rely on a folder icon any more.
(2024-04-21, 02:55)vonson Wrote: Removing a movie from the library which has versions associated to it seems not to clean the associated versions. The 'main' movie itself could be scanned again into library, but the versions were not available in the libray any more AND could not be scanned into library. I had to rename the folders, clean the database, rename the folders back, and then could rescan and finally re-associate them as versions.Currently to 'clean' a version you should first remove all the non-standard versions using the video manager, and then remove the standard version from the library.
(2024-04-21, 03:00)vonson Wrote: BTW, since v21 I have a more pressing issue unrelated to the movie versions: most movies won't play any more at all, they start, run 5-10 sec and then just stop. I have posted this in the 'Kodi v21 "Omega" Stable Release - Issues Discussions ' thread, and I'd prefer this issue to be fixed a lot more urgently than the version thing...Please report this on GitHub.