[jdig4240]

Yeah, you should be able to do that with no problem. If you get errors or something from doing that, let me know. It doesn't always work if you do that with widget groups, but shortcut groups should be fine. 

Ok, so I would need to keep the original shotcut group in the root of the groups also. I see, so when i sent a shortcut group to another group it it doesnt copy it, it links it correct? So I need to keep the original there. I was thinking i could delete the original after i sent it to another shortcut group so theres not a mess of groups. 

Correct, it just links to whatever the shortcut was for, so removing the group would break the shortcut.

I certainly like the idea of making shortcut groups more flexible in that way, but it would probably require a substantial part of the logic behind how groups are added and stored to be overhauled. I'm trying to come up with a good way to handle it if I ever decide to go down that path in the future. 

Sounds good. Dont let me sway you off your intended path on this. I appreciate the functionality of what you created already. Maybe it would make more sense if somebody took a look at Superfavorites and tried to fix that instead, but i think the code is pretty complicated.