Why dont you implement recording when its perfectly viable, providers *cant* block it
#1
I've seen a few posts from Kodi admins, and I cant accept that

- providers block it. No, its a transport stream, you can record it.
- its somehow copyrighted. How would the software know?
- its not supported by the API. Not exactly compelling

Can someone come clean about this?
Reply
#2
Come clean about what? There is no conspiracy here which is what you are implying.

What do you want to record?
My Signature
Links to : Official:Forum rules (wiki) | Official:Forum rules/Banned add-ons (wiki) | Debug Log (wiki)
Links to : HOW-TO:Create Music Library (wiki) | HOW-TO:Create_Video_Library (wiki)  ||  Artwork (wiki) | Basic controls (wiki) | Import-export library (wiki) | Movie sets (wiki) | Movie universe (wiki) | NFO files (wiki) | Quick start guide (wiki)
Reply
#3
This is about the IPTV client, i should have added that in.
Reply
#4
(2021-07-15, 11:03)Karellen Wrote: Come clean about what? There is no conspiracy here which is what you are implying.

What do you want to record?

From the IPTV client.
Reply
#5
There was/is a fork of it that records.  See https://forum.kodi.tv/showthread.php?tid=329991  It is however written in python2 and therefore not compatible with v19 onwards.  There may be a Matrix compatible version if you look through the thread for it.
Learning Linux the hard way !!
Reply
#6
Simply put we do don't want to bring unnecessary attention to Kodi from the media giants as allowing IP streams to be recorded could facilitate piracy.
Reply
#7
The work-round would be an external player that has this capability.
Reply

Logout Mark Read Team Forum Stats Members Help
Why dont you implement recording when its perfectly viable, providers *cant* block it0