2024-12-11, 19:49
This would fix 21554 (GH issue) and finally enable people with less powerful devices to be able to watch anything they want without heavy stuttering when subs are enabled.
(2024-12-11, 20:15)izprtxqkft Wrote: are you just quoting sarbes? https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/issues/2155...1935607701
the rest of the comments seem to suggest the other solution is to do nothing long enough that the low end devices that exhibit the issue(s) are phased out and sent to e-waste
(paraphrased, they actually suggest just buy better hardware)
(2024-12-11, 20:30)Badly1597 Wrote: Unfortunately most people living in developing countries can't change tvs that easily and even then, TVs with low end processors are extremely widespread in the market unfortunately
It would be sad if most devs think like that about this issue, it will never be fixed in that case these devices can perfectly handle 4K HDR videos even high bitrate sometimes with other players and apps, why not make Kodi the absolute best player for every device?
(2024-12-11, 20:38)izprtxqkft Wrote:Your logic is completely flawed. First of all who said people in developing countries buy and rip blu-rays? Do you think anyone with that kind of money would be complaining? I know absolutely NO one who owns such a device in my country, we just resort to p**acy either from shady websites, t*rrenting, etc and host it from pcs(2024-12-11, 20:30)Badly1597 Wrote: Unfortunately most people living in developing countries can't change tvs that easily and even then, TVs with low end processors are extremely widespread in the market unfortunately
It would be sad if most devs think like that about this issue, it will never be fixed in that case these devices can perfectly handle 4K HDR videos even high bitrate sometimes with other players and apps, why not make Kodi the absolute best player for every device?
users in developing countries can't get higher end devices
but they can get 4K BluRay movies and have the PC Hardware capable of copying that disc while also affording the Storage required to store it after the fact
(plus the networking to serve it from a storage server in some cases)
and a Television/display that is 4K HDR
all that but not 1 single better piece of playback hardware?
sorry, i don't subscribe to that logic
-----
developers code for what they own and use, if a developer in a "developing country" is having issues with their device then they will write the code to fix it
if i had only $50 to spend on a playback device i would buy a bluray player then feed my family with the remaining $30
(2024-12-11, 20:38)izprtxqkft Wrote: users in developing countries can't get higher end devicesWhile that may, or may not, be true, please lets not be aggressive to other members.
but they can get 4K BluRay movies and have the PC Hardware capable of copying that disc while also affording the Storage required to store it after the fact
(plus the networking to serve it from a storage server in some cases)
and a Television/display that is 4K HDR
(2024-12-11, 21:04)Karellen Wrote: While that may, or may not, be true, please lets not be aggressive to other members.
We have no idea of the circumstances and financial situation of other members.
(2024-12-11, 21:10)izprtxqkft Wrote:What are you even talking about? You're acting like a 4 year old responding things like "unsubscribed" and calling me "ilegitimate" and making stuff up about the "equipment required beforehand" (any working computer or laptop even if it's very low end or old and internet), please grow up. I do not wish to be associated to people like you either, you're not contributing by any means so please refrain from posting in this thread anymore(2024-12-11, 21:04)Karellen Wrote: While that may, or may not, be true, please lets not be aggressive to other members.
We have no idea of the circumstances and financial situation of other members.
aggressive towards a notion that buying a better device is not an option because it's too expensive when the equipment required beforehand to make the device even useful is more expensive
the user proved my point with their response though and as i don't associate with those types of individuals this user is in no further danger of aggression from me
in the future i will exercise my ignore options sooner so they should be in effect before any aggressive posts are made
apologies to any legitimate users who are offended
(2024-12-11, 22:40)jjd-uk Wrote: As it happens this is one of the long term aims of the project, mainly to allow Kodi to run completely headless. However it's not a simple task as the code became so entangled over the first 15 years of the projects life, in the early years in particular there were no real code standards, so in many cases if it worked then it was added. But slowly bit by bit the devs are working to untangle it, and due to this work we now have coding standards, and having working code is not the only criteria for getting code contributions merged now.