2009-03-24, 18:04
Thank you all for your enthusiasm and support!
I can live with the linked style and wording, but I really don't want to maintain a method, which is not supported by the Devs. I don't wish anyone of you, who followed the guide to find yourself in a situation, when a Dev ask you, if you followed that "crappy" guide, then not support you, if the answer is yes.
So, at the moment, I am waiting for confirmation from them, if you guys are all still on the safe side and supportable, even if you are using this method.
Until then, I had put some extra warnings (there are plenty of them already), put back the config files online, and did some cleanup.
I can live with the linked style and wording, but I really don't want to maintain a method, which is not supported by the Devs. I don't wish anyone of you, who followed the guide to find yourself in a situation, when a Dev ask you, if you followed that "crappy" guide, then not support you, if the answer is yes.
So, at the moment, I am waiting for confirmation from them, if you guys are all still on the safe side and supportable, even if you are using this method.
Until then, I had put some extra warnings (there are plenty of them already), put back the config files online, and did some cleanup.