2009-05-10, 07:40
This is a shame.
I really liked that page and how well it was maintained. Just curious... what parts of the guide are unadvised and unsupported? From what I can see, the only part that really should concern xbmc team is compiling xbmc from svn. The rest is just a good ubuntu linux how to. I'm not concerned that you removed the page (as I have all the information I need) but I really think you should re-instate that page unitl your "updated" wiki content is ready.
Secondly, any regular forum member would know that all the information provided by that page is littered throughout the Linux Support forum. Why make it harder for people to find until the new wiki pages are ready?
Zepp
I really liked that page and how well it was maintained. Just curious... what parts of the guide are unadvised and unsupported? From what I can see, the only part that really should concern xbmc team is compiling xbmc from svn. The rest is just a good ubuntu linux how to. I'm not concerned that you removed the page (as I have all the information I need) but I really think you should re-instate that page unitl your "updated" wiki content is ready.
Secondly, any regular forum member would know that all the information provided by that page is littered throughout the Linux Support forum. Why make it harder for people to find until the new wiki pages are ready?
Zepp