2009-05-11, 01:48
pyrates Wrote:So in other words it was never about the so called "bad parts" of the guide that you deemed to be incorrect, you just didn't want this kind of setup in the first place. That would explain why you never told those who could edit it what needed to be changed. Thanks for using the excuse that it was full of bad practices as the lie. Your original excuse no longer adds up and I can no longer trust your reasons for removing it since you lied in the first place.
Uhm...OK. I'm not sure how you constructed that line of crap. The "bad parts" were extremely unsafe (main reason for disapproval), not incorrect, UNSAFE. These are the parts I'm talking about not wanting to support. The apt breakage stuff was secondary, it looks bad for "us" to be recommending people bad practices like these. Not to mention when users go off looking for support for other things, most will be less likely to help because their system is "non-standard." If you want to go on trying to paint me as the bad guy (I wasn't even the one to remove it), go for it. But in the long run this the safe option for XBMC user's as a whole.